Cited by 85Tea Polyphenols and EffectsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCoffee research and impacts

Effects of tea intake on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Liu, Gang, Mi, Xue-Nan, Zheng, Xin-Xin, Xu, Yan-Lu, Lu, Jie, Huang, Xiao-Hong·2014·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

The effect of tea intake on blood pressure (BP) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to determine the changes in systolic and diastolic BP due to the intake of black and green tea. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to May 2014. The weighted mean difference was calculated for net changes in systolic and diastolic BP using fixed-effects or random-effects models. Previously defined subgroup analyses were performed to explore the influence of study characteristics. A total of twenty-five eligible studies with 1476 subjects were selected. The acute intake of tea had no effects on systolic and diastolic BP. However, after long-term tea intake, the pooled mean systolic and diastolic BP were lower by − 1·8 (95 % CI − 2·4, − 1·1) and − 1·4 (95 % CI − 2·2, − 0·6) mmHg, respectively. When stratified by type of tea, green tea significantly reduced systolic BP by 2·1 (95 % CI − 2·9, − 1·2) mmHg and decreased diastolic BP by 1·7 (95 % CI − 2·9, − 0·5) mmHg, and black tea showed a reduction in systolic BP of 1·4 (95 % CI − 2·4, − 0·4) mmHg and a decrease in diastolic BP of 1·1 (95 % CI − 1·9, − 0·2) mmHg. The subgroup analyses showed that the BP-lowering effect was apparent in subjects who consumed tea more than 12 weeks (systolic BP − 2·6 (95 % CI − 3·5, − 1·7) mmHg and diastolic BP − 2·2 (95 % CI − 3·0, − 1·3) mmHg, both P < 0·001). The present findings suggest that long-term ( ≥ 12 weeks) ingestion of tea could result in a significant reduction in systolic and diastolic BP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114514001731

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In meta-analyses of trials, green tea, black tea, and herbal roselle tea each modestly lower BP; green and black tea, but not herbal roselle tea, also lower LDL-cholesterol.

    “However, in meta-analyses of trials, green tea, black tea, and herbal roselle tea each modestly lower BP;279-281 while green and black tea, but not herbal roselle tea, also lower LDL-cholesterol.282-284”
  • In meta-analyses of trials, green tea, black tea, and herbal roselle tea each modestly lower BP; green and black tea, but not herbal roselle tea, also lower LDL-cholesterol.

    “However, in meta-analyses of trials, green tea, black tea, and herbal roselle tea each modestly lower BP;279-281 while green and black tea, but not herbal roselle tea, also lower LDL-cholesterol.282-284”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Higgins JPT and Green S (editors) (2009) Cochrane Hand- book for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2. New York, NY: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, G., Mi, X.-N., Zheng, X.-X., Xu, Y.-L., Lu, J., & Huang, X.-H.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2014-08-19
Volume
112
Issue
7
Pages
1043-1054
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2074590195
Cited by
85
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
tea consumption, blood pressure, black tea, green tea, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diastole, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Systole, Tea, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, MEDLINE, Camellia sinensis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review