Cited by 184Tea Polyphenols and EffectsPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesCoffee research and impacts

Tea and cardiovascular disease

Open access
Deka, Apranta, Vita, Joseph A.·2011·Pharmacological Research

Abstract

There is increasing evidence for a protective effect of tea consumption against cardiovascular disease. This review summarizes the available epidemiological data providing evidence for and against such an effect. We also review observational and intervention studies that investigated an effect of tea and tea extracts on cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure, serum lipids, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Finally, we review potential mechanisms of benefit, including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-proliferative effects, as well as favorable effects on endothelial function. Overall, the observational data suggest a benefit, but results are mixed and likely confounded by lifestyle and background dietary factors. The weight of evidence indicates favorable effects on risk factors and a number of plausible mechanisms have been elucidated in experimental and translational human studies. Despite the growing body evidence, it remains uncertain whether tea consumption should be recommended to the general population or to patients as a strategy to reduce cardiovascular risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.03.009

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deka, A., & Vita, J. A.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Vita, Joseph A.
Venue
Pharmacological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-08
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
136-145
ISSN
1043-6618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966599364
Cited by
184
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmacological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • DSM Nutritional Products
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL102299, HL081587, P50HL083801, HL083269, K12HL083781, P01HL081587, R01HL075795, HL75795, R01HL083269, HL083801, HL102299)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Tea Polyphenols and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
tea consumption, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors, blood pressure, serum lipids, diabetes mellitus, obesity, anti-inflammatory activity, antioxidant activity, antiproliferative activity, endothelial function, tea extract, lifestyle confounding
MeSH terms
Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Risk Factors, Tea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review