Cited by 419Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Influence of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized controlled trials

Saneei, P., Salehi-Abargouei, A., Esmaillzadeh, A., Azadbakht, L.·2014·Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Background and aims Findings were not consistent on the therapeutic effect of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet on blood pressure. We aimed to review systematically and perform a meta-analysis to assess the magnitude of the effect of the DASH diet on blood pressure in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among adults.Methods and results We conducted a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of all RCTs which evaluated the effect of the DASH diet on blood pressure including published papers until June 2013, using PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Scopus and Google scholar database. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to find out possible sources of between-study heterogeneity. Seventeen RCTs contributing 20 comparisons with 2561 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that the DASH diet significantly reduced systolic blood pressure by 6.74 mmHg (95%CI: -8.25, -5.23, I(2) = 78.1%) and diastolic blood pressure by 3.54 mmHg (95%CI: -4.29, -2.79, I(2) = 56.7%). RCTs with the energy restriction and those with hypertensive subjects showed a significantly greater decrease in blood pressure. Meta-regression showed that mean baseline of SBP and DBP was explained 24% and 49% of the variance between studies for SBP and DBP, respectively.Conclusion The results revealed the profitable reducing effect of the DASH-like diet on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults; although there was a variation in the extent of the fall in blood pressure in different subgroups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.06.008

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saneei, P., Salehi-Abargouei, A., Esmaillzadeh, A., & Azadbakht, L.
Affiliations
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Azadbakht, L.
Venue
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1253-1261
ISSN
0939-4753 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009648612
Cited by
419
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 13 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
DASH diet, blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, caloric restriction, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Diet, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review