Cited by 111Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Universal prevention of depression in women postnatally: cluster randomized trial evidence in primary care

Open access
Brugha, T. S., Morrell, C. J., Slade, P., Walters, S. J.·2011·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: To test whether receiving care from a health visitor (HV) trained in identification and psychological intervention methods prevents depression 6–18 months postnatally in women who are not depressed 6 weeks postnatally. Method: The study was a prospective cluster trial, randomized by GP practice, with follow-up for 18 months in 101 primary care teams in the Trent area of England. The participants were women scoring <12 on the postal Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) at 6 weeks postnatally (1474 intervention and 767 control women). Intervention HVs (n=89, 63 clusters) were trained in identifying depressive symptoms using the EPDS and face-to-face clinical assessment and in providing psychologically orientated sessions based on cognitive behavioral or person-centered principles. The control group comprised HVs (n=49, 37 clusters) providing care as usual (CAU). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women scoring ⩾12 on the EPDS at 6 months postnatally. Secondary outcomes were mean EPDS score, Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) score, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) and Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF) scores at 6, 12 and 18 months. Results: After adjusting for individual-level covariates, living alone, previous postnatal depression (PND), the presence of one or more adverse life events and the 6-week EPDS score, the odds ratio (OR) for EPDS ⩾12 at 6 months was 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53–0.97, p=0.031] for the intervention group (IG) women compared with the control (CAU) group women. Two subgroups were formed by baseline severity: a ‘subthreshold’ subgroup with a 6-week EPDS score of 6–11 (n=999) and a ‘lowest severity’ subgroup with a 6-week EPDS score of 0–5 (n=1242). There was no difference in psychological effectiveness by subgroup (interaction term: z=−0.28, p=0.782). Conclusions: This study provides new evidence of a universal, enduring preventive effect for depression in women who screen negative for depression postnatally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291710001467

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brugha TS Morrell CJ Slade P Dixon S 2009 Prevention of postnatal depression: cost-effectiveness of health visitor training; results from a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care. Ninth Workshop on Costs and Assessment in Psychiatry. Quality and Outcomes in Mental Health Policy and Economics Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 12 (Suppl. 1), S8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brugha, T. S., Morrell, C. J., Slade, P., & Walters, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Brugha, T. S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2010-08-18
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
739-748
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2155559456
Cited by
111
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (99/33/51)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
postpartum depression, universal prevention, health visitors, primary care, cognitive behavioral therapy, client-centered therapy, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, subthreshold depression, parental stress, anxiety, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Community Health Nursing, England, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Change Events, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Cluster Analysis, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review