Cited by 19Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSchizophrenia research and treatmentMemory Processes and Influences

Intrusions in trauma and psychosis: Information processing and phenomenology

Marks, E. M., Steel, C., Peters, E. R.·2012·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrusions are common symptoms of both post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and schizophrenia. It has been suggested that an information processing style characterized by weak trait contextual integration renders psychotic individuals vulnerable to intrusive experiences. This 'contextual integration hypothesis' was tested in individuals reporting anomalous experiences in the absence of a need for care. METHOD: Twenty-six low schizotypes and 23 individuals reporting anomalous experiences were shown a traumatic film with and without a concurrent visuospatial task (VST). Participants rated post-traumatic intrusions for frequency and form, and completed self-report measures of information processing style. It was predicted that, because of their weaker trait contextual integration, the anomalous experiences (AE) group would (1) exhibit more intrusions following exposure to the trauma film, (2) display intrusions characterized by more PTSD qualities and (3) show a greater reduction of intrusions with the concurrent VST. RESULTS: As predicted, the AE group reported a lower level of trait contextual integration and more intrusions than the low schizotypes, both immediately after watching the film and during the following 7 days. Their post-traumatic intrusive memories were more PTSD-like (more intrusive, vivid and associated with emotion). The VST had no effect on the number of intrusions in either group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide some support for the proposal that weak trait contextual integration underlies the development of intrusions within both PTSD and psychosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291712000505

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marks, E. M., Steel, C., & Peters, E. R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Peters, E. R.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2012-03-23
Volume
42
Issue
11
Pages
2313-2323
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2112551962
Cited by
19
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-1207-15027)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
intrusive memories, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, schizotypy, anomalous experiences, information processing style, visuospatial tasks, psychosis vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Schizotypal Personality Disorder, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review