Cited by 546Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychotherapeutic benefits of compassion-focused therapy: an early systematic review

Open access
Leaviss, J., Uttley, L.·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compassion-focused therapy (CFT) is a relatively novel form of psychotherapy that was developed for people who have mental health problems primarily linked to high shame and self-criticism. The aim of this early systematic review was to draw together the current research evidence of the effectiveness of CFT as a psychotherapeutic intervention, and to provide recommendations that may inform the development of further trials. METHOD: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was undertaken to systematically identify literature relating to the effectiveness of CFT as a psychotherapeutic intervention. Reference lists of key journals were hand searched and contact with experts in the field was made to identify unpublished data. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review, including three randomized controlled studies. The findings from the included studies were, in the most part, favourable to CFT, and in particular seemed to be effective for people who were high in self-criticism. CONCLUSIONS: CFT shows promise as an intervention for mood disorders, particularly those high in self-criticism. However, more large-scale, high-quality trials are needed before it can be considered evidence-based practice. The review highlights issues from the current evidence that may be used to inform such trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714002141

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram (Moher et al. 2009). CFT, Compassion-focused therapy.
Fig. 1. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram (Moher et al. 2009). CFT, Compassion-focused therapy.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2001, An Open Heart: Practicing Compassion in Everyday Life
  2. 2004, Guideline Development Methods. Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Developers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 545

Metadata

Authors
Leaviss, J., & Uttley, L.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Leaviss, J.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-09-12
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
927-945
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2150285866
Cited by
546
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Sheffield
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
compassion-focused therapy, shame, self-criticism, mood disorders, treatment efficacy, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Empathy, Humans, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Shame, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review