Cited by 29Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Objective measures of reward sensitivity and motivation in people with high v. low anhedonia

Open access
Slaney, Chloe, Perkins, Adam M., Davis, Robert, Penton-Voak, Ian, Munafò, Marcus R., Houghton, Conor J., Robinson, Emma S. J.·2023·Psychological Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Anhedonia – a diminished interest or pleasure in activities – is a core self-reported symptom of depression which is poorly understood and often resistant to conventional antidepressants. This symptom may occur due to dysfunction in one or more sub-components of reward processing: motivation, consummatory experience and/or learning. However, the precise impairments remain elusive. Dissociating these components (ideally, using cross-species measures) and relating them to the subjective experience of anhedonia is critical as it may benefit fundamental biology research and novel drug development. Methods: Using a battery of behavioural tasks based on rodent assays, we examined reward motivation (Joystick-Operated Runway Task, JORT; and Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task, EEfRT) and reward sensitivity (Sweet Taste Test) in a non-clinical population who scored high ( N = 32) or low ( N = 34) on an anhedonia questionnaire (Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale). Results: Compared to the low anhedonia group, the high anhedonia group displayed marginal impairments in effort-based decision-making (EEfRT) and reduced reward sensitivity (Sweet Taste Test). However, we found no evidence of a difference between groups in physical effort exerted for reward (JORT). Interestingly, whilst the EEfRT and Sweet Taste Test correlated with anhedonia measures, they did not correlate with each other. This poses the question of whether there are subgroups within anhedonia; however, further work is required to directly test this hypothesis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that anhedonia is a heterogeneous symptom associated with impairments in reward sensitivity and effort-based decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291722001052

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slaney, C., Perkins, A. M., Davis, R., Penton-Voak, I., Munafò, M. R., Houghton, C. J., & Robinson, E. S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Slaney, Chloe
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2022-05-12
Volume
53
Issue
10
Pages
4324-4332
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W4280581945
Cited by
29
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (108899/B/15/Z)
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • King's College London
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/7)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
anhedonia, reward sensitivity, reward motivation, effort-based decision making, sweet taste preference, Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, depression
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Decision Making, Humans, Motivation, Reward, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review