Objective measures of reward sensitivity and motivation in people with high v. low anhedonia
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Anhedonia – a diminished interest or pleasure in activities – is a core self-reported symptom of depression which is poorly understood and often resistant to conventional antidepressants. This symptom may occur due to dysfunction in one or more sub-components of reward processing: motivation, consummatory experience and/or learning. However, the precise impairments remain elusive. Dissociating these components (ideally, using cross-species measures) and relating them to the subjective experience of anhedonia is critical as it may benefit fundamental biology research and novel drug development. Methods: Using a battery of behavioural tasks based on rodent assays, we examined reward motivation (Joystick-Operated Runway Task, JORT; and Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task, EEfRT) and reward sensitivity (Sweet Taste Test) in a non-clinical population who scored high ( N = 32) or low ( N = 34) on an anhedonia questionnaire (Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale). Results: Compared to the low anhedonia group, the high anhedonia group displayed marginal impairments in effort-based decision-making (EEfRT) and reduced reward sensitivity (Sweet Taste Test). However, we found no evidence of a difference between groups in physical effort exerted for reward (JORT). Interestingly, whilst the EEfRT and Sweet Taste Test correlated with anhedonia measures, they did not correlate with each other. This poses the question of whether there are subgroups within anhedonia; however, further work is required to directly test this hypothesis. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that anhedonia is a heterogeneous symptom associated with impairments in reward sensitivity and effort-based decision-making.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Impaired reward processing is associated with such symptoms across different psychiatric disorders.
“This is in line with previous literature suggesting that impaired reward processing is associated with such symptoms across different psychiatric disorders.56,61,121–125”
From Investigating disorder-specific and transdiagnostic alterations in model-based and model-free decision-making (2024) · cites this paper as [124]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?
Berridge, K. C., & Robinson, T. E. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 · Cited by 4,127 · see citing works
Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning
Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W. (2009) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014 · Cited by 1,942 · see citing works
Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: Lessons from translational neuroscience
Treadway, M. T., & Zald, D. H. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006 · Cited by 1,579 · see citing works
Scales for physical and social anhedonia.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1976) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.85.4.374 · Cited by 1,234 · see citing works
The neurobiology of anhedonia and other reward-related deficits
Der-Avakian, A., & Markou, A. (2012) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.005 · Cited by 1,130 · see citing works
Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study
Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.001 · Cited by 1,015 · see citing works
Treadway, M. T., Bossaller, N. A., Shelton, R. C., & Zald, D. H. (2012) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028813 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Neural representation of reward in recovered depressed patients
McCabe, C., Cowen, P. J., & Harmer, C. J. (2009) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-009-1573-9 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Unipolar depression does not moderate responses to the Sweet Taste Test
Dichter, G. S., Smoski, M. J., Kampov-Polevoy, A. B., Gallop, R., & Garbutt, J. C. (2010) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20690 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Dopamine, effort-based choice, and behavioral economics: basic and translational research.
Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., Yang, J.-H., Rotolo, R., & Presby, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00052 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Rzepa, E., Fisk, J., & McCabe, C. (2017) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881116681416 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Knolle, F., Sen, P., Culbreth, A., Koch, K., Schmitz-Koep, B., Gürsel, D. A., Wunderlich, K., Avram, M., Berberich, G., Sorg, C., et al. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience · doi:10.1503/jpn.240020 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Slaney, C., Perkins, A. M., Davis, R., Penton-Voak, I., Munafò, M. R., Houghton, C. J., & Robinson, E. S. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- King's College London (GB)
- Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Slaney, Chloe
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2022-05-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4324-4332
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- PMC
- PMC10388304
- OpenAlex
- W4280581945
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (108899/B/15/Z)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- King's College London
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00011/7)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- anhedonia, reward sensitivity, reward motivation, effort-based decision making, sweet taste preference, Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale, depression
- MeSH terms
- Antidepressive Agents, Decision Making, Humans, Motivation, Reward, Anhedonia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review