Cited by 89Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Assessing expectancy and suggestibility in a trial of escitalopram v. psilocybin for depression

Open access
Szigeti, Balázs, Weiss, Brandon, Rosas, Fernando E., Erritzoe, David, Nutt, David, Carhart-Harris, Robin·2024·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: To investigate the association between pre-trial expectancy, suggestibility, and response to treatment in a trial of escitalopram and investigational drug, COMP360, psilocybin, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03429075). Methods: We used data (n = 55) from our recent double-blind, parallel-group, randomized head-to-head comparison trial of escitalopram and investigational drug, COMP360, psilocybin. Mixed linear models were used to investigate the association between pre-treatment efficacy-related expectations, as well as baseline trait suggestibility and absorption, and therapeutic response to both escitalopram and COMP360 psilocybin. Results: Patients had significantly higher expectancy for psilocybin relative to escitalopram; however, expectancy for escitalopram was associated with improved therapeutic outcomes to escitalopram, expectancy for psilocybin was not predictive of response to psilocybin. Separately, we found that pre-treatment trait suggestibility was associated with therapeutic response in the psilocybin arm, but not in the escitalopram arm. Conclusions: Overall, our results suggest that psychedelic therapy may be less vulnerable to expectancy biases than previously suspected. The relationship between baseline trait suggestibility and response to psilocybin therapy implies that highly suggestible individuals may be primed for response to this treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291723003653

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential confounding effect of high positive expectancy has been seen in previous studies of PAT.

    “The potential confounding effect of high positive expectancy has been seen in previous studies of PAT [58,59].”

    From Psilocybin‐assisted psychotherapy for methamphetamine use disorder: A pilot open‐label safety and feasibility study. (2025) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction says positive expectancy may affect responses in psychedelic studies, and the Discussion reports an expectancy-related bias in the trial’s comparison of psilocybin with escitalopram. But the Discussion explicitly attributes that bias to low expectancy in the escitalopram arm, not to patients benefiting from high positive expectancy for psilocybin. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szigeti, B., Weiss, B., Rosas, F. E., Erritzoe, D., Nutt, D., & Carhart-Harris, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Szigeti, Balázs
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2024-01-22
Volume
54
Issue
8
Pages
1717-1724
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W4391109410
Cited by
89
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 18
FWCI
44.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
expectancy, suggestibility, psilocybin, escitalopram, major depressive disorder, depression treatment response, placebo response, psychedelic therapy, absorption, treatment outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Escitalopram, Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hallucinogens, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psilocybin, Suggestion, Citalopram, Treatment Outcome, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review