Cited by 158Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Cognitive reactivity, suicidal ideation and future fluency: preliminary investigation of a differential activation theory of hopelessness/suicidality

Williams, J. M. G., Van der Does, A. J. W., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., Segal, Z. S.·2008·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-006-9105-y

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, J. M. G., Van der Does, A. J. W., Barnhofer, T., Crane, C., & Segal, Z. S.
Affiliations
Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, J. M. G.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2007-04-10
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
83-104
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2028872290
Cited by
158
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
cognitive reactivity, suicidal ideation, hopelessness, suicidality, cognitive reappraisal, generativity, depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review