Cited by 216Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolencePsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Selected symptoms associated with sexual and physical abuse history among female patients with gastrointestinal disorders: the impact on subsequent health care visits

LESERMAN, J., LI, Z., DROSSMAN, D. A., HU, Y. J. B.·1998·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Despite a growing literature pointing to the deleterious health effects of sexual and physical abuse history, few studies provide evidence about which medical symptoms are most affected. The aim of this paper is to determine the impact of sexual and physical abuse history on a selected set of medical symptoms, and to test how such abuse, medical symptoms and functional disability may affect subsequent health care visits. Methods We studied 239 women from a referral-based gastroenterology clinic; follow-up data were available on 196 of these women. All women were interviewed about sexual and physical abuse history. Results Women with abuse history, particularly those with severe abuse, were much more likely to report somatic symptoms related to panic (e.g. palpitations, numbness, shortness of breath), depression (e.g. difficulty sleeping, loss of appetite), musculoskeletal disorders (e.g. headaches, muscle aches), genito-urinary disorders (e.g. vaginal discharge, pelvic pain, painful intercourse), skin disturbance (e.g. rash) and respiratory illness (e.g. stuffy nose). Furthermore, we found that the severity of abuse history, somatic symptoms and functional disability predicted 30% of the variance in health care visits during the subsequent year, and that the effect of abuse severity on visits was explained by abused women having more somatic symptoms and functional disability. Conclusions Patients' reports of abuse history, somatic symptoms and functional disabilit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291797006508

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LESERMAN, J., LI, Z., DROSSMAN, D. A., & HU, Y. J. B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1998-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
417-425
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2001883997
Cited by
216
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh046959-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH46959)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
child sexual abuse, physical abuse, abuse history, somatic symptoms, functional disability, gastrointestinal diseases, women, health care utilization, panic symptoms, depression, musculoskeletal disorders, genitourinary diseases, abuse severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Child, Child Abuse, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Health Services, Health Status, Humans, Middle Aged, North Carolina, Prospective Studies, Rape, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Violence, Trauma Severity Indices, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Women's Health, Sickness Impact Profile, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review