Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marine04 Marine Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0–26 Cal Kyr Bp

Open access
Hughen, Konrad A, Baillie, Mike G L, Bard, Edouard, Warren Beck, J, Bertrand, Chanda J H, Blackwell, Paul G, Buck, Caitlin E, Burr, George S, Cutler, Kirsten B, Damon, Paul E, Edwards, Richard L, Fairbanks, Richard G, Friedrich, Michael, Guilderson, Thomas P, Kromer, Bernd, McCormac, Gerry, Manning, Sturt, Bronk Ramsey, Christopher, Reimer, Paula J, Reimer, Ron W, Remmele, Sabine, Southon, John R, Stuiver, Minze, Talamo, Sahra, Taylor, F W, VAN der Plicht, Johannes, Weyhenmeyer, Constanze E·2004·Radiocarbon

Abstract

New radiocarbon calibration curves, IntCal04 and Marine04, have been constructed and internationally ratified to replace the terrestrial and marine components of IntCal98. The new calibration data sets extend an additional 2000 yr, from 0–26 cal kyr BP (Before Present, 0 cal BP = AD 1950), and provide much higher resolution, greater precision, and more detailed structure than IntCal98. For the Marine04 curve, dendrochronologically-dated tree-ring samples, converted with a box diffusion model to marine mixed-layer ages, cover the period from 0–10.5 cal kyr BP. Beyond 10.5 cal kyr BP, high-resolution marine data become available from foraminifera in varved sediments and U/Th-dated corals. The marine records are corrected with site-specific 14 C reservoir age information to provide a single global marine mixed-layer calibration from 10.5–26.0 cal kyr BP. A substantial enhancement relative to IntCal98 is the introduction of a random walk model, which takes into account the uncertainty in both the calendar age and the 14 C age to calculate the underlying calibration curve (Buck and Blackwell, this issue). The marine data sets and calibration curve for marine samples from the surface mixed layer (Marine04) are discussed here. The tree-ring data sets, sources of uncertainty, and regional offsets are presented in detail in a companion paper by Reimer et al. (this issue).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200033002

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 1,184

Metadata

Authors
Hughen, K. A., Baillie, M. G. L., Bard, E., Warren Beck, J., Bertrand, C. J. H., Blackwell, P. G., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S., Cutler, K. B., Damon, P. E., Edwards, R. L., Fairbanks, R. G., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T. P., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., Manning, S., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, P. J., Reimer, R. W., Remmele, S., Southon, J. R., Stuiver, M., Talamo, S., Taylor, F. W., VAN der Plicht, J., & Weyhenmeyer, C. E.
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2004
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
1059-1086
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W1909880476
Cited by
1,184
References
7
FWCI
60.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marine04 Marine Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0–26 Cal Kyr Bp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033822200033002
The paper
Hughen, K. A., Baillie, M. G. L., Bard, E., Warren Beck, J., Bertrand, C. J. H., Blackwell, P. G., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S., Cutler, K. B., Damon, P. E., Edwards, R. L., Fairbanks, R. G., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T. P., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., Manning, S., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, P. J., . . . Weyhenmeyer, C. E. (2004). Marine04 Marine Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0–26 Cal Kyr Bp. Radiocarbon. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033822200033002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.