The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992
Abstract
The authors test Kantian and realist theories of interstate conflict using data extending over more than a century, treating those theories as complementary rather than competing. As the classical liberals believed, democracy, economic interdependence, and international organizations have strong and statistically significant effects on reducing the probability that states will be involved in militarized disputes. Moreover, the benefits are not limited to the cold war era. Some realist influences, notably distance and power predominance, also reduce the likelihood of interstate conflict. The character of the international system, too, affects the probability of dyadic disputes. The consequences of having a strong hegemonic power vary, but high levels of democracy and interdependence in the international system reduce the probability of conflict for all dyads, not just for those that are democratic or dependent on trade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of International Politics
Frankel, J., & Waltz, K. N. (1980) · International Journal · doi:10.2307/40201892 · Cited by 8,506
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals
Robinson, W. S. (1950) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087176 · Cited by 4,513
War and Change in World Politics
Gilpin, R. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664267 · Cited by 4,020
Power and Interdependence: World Politics In Transition
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim280020670 · Cited by 3,073
The False Promise of International Institutions
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994) · International Security · doi:10.2307/2539078 · Cited by 2,680
Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable
Beck, N., Katz, J. N., & Tucker, R. (1998) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991857 · Cited by 2,471
Monitoring the world economy, 1820-1992
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2851 · Cited by 2,413
The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century
Pierre, A. J., & Huntington, S. P. (1992) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045138 · Cited by 1,766
The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis
Wallerstein, I. (1974) · Comparative Studies in Society and History · doi:10.1017/s0010417500007520 · Cited by 1,466
Cited by
What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions
ROTHSTEIN, B., & TEORELL, J. (2008) · Governance · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x · Cited by 1,446
At War's End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict
Paris, R. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790836 · Cited by 1,365
Gartzke, E. (2007) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00244.x · Cited by 744
Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996
Davenport, C., & Armstrong, D. A. (2004) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00086.x · Cited by 652
Democracy, Development, and the International System
BOIX, C. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000402 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B.
- Venue
- World Politics
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0043-8871 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3338
- OpenAlex
- W4231245947
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 39.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0043887100020013
- The paper
- Oneal, J. R., & Russett, B. (1999). The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992. World Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887100020013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
