The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negotiated interaction in the L2 classroom
Abstract
The present paper reports on an approximate replication of Foster's (1998) study on the negotiation of meaning. Foster investigated the interactional adjustments produced by L2 English learners working on different types of language learning tasks in a classroom setting. The replication study duplicates the methods of data collection and data analysis of the original study, but alters the target language (L2 German) and adds a stimulated recall methodology. The results of the replication study partially confirm Foster's results, and introduce some further differentiated findings. It is concluded that the original study's concern with the transferability of laboratory findings to classroom settings should be investigated in greater detail.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although negotiation for meaning is sometimes present during communicative interaction, it has become clear that such negotiation does not always occur frequently in the classroom (Foster 1998;Eckerth 2009).”
From Interaction and instructed second language acquisition (2018) · cites this paper as Eckerth 2009
Citations
Cites
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028845 · Cited by 26,084
Task-based Language Learning and Teaching
Ellis, R. (2003) · Asian Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.65961/ajelt-2003-1-009 · Cited by 3,601
Nunan, D. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667336 · Cited by 1,823
Group Work, Interlanguage Talk, and Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586827 · Cited by 901 · cited 2×
“…whereas a speaker’s repetition of an interlocutor’s previous utterance with rising intonation has typically been labeled ‘clarification request’ (e.g. Long & Porter 1985; Pica et al. 1989; Pica 1994; Gass 1997; Gass et al. 2005), it is not always clear whether the speaker’s intention actually…”
BackgroundMethodInstructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement
Doughty, C. J. (2003) · The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1002/9780470756492.ch10 · Cited by 519
"Information Gap" Tasks: Do They Facilitate Second Language Acquisition?
Doughty, C., & Pica, T. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586546 · Cited by 498
Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction
Swan, M. (2005) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/ami013 · Cited by 481
INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM AND SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
Loewen, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050163 · Cited by 381
The Effects of Referential Questions on ESL Classroom Discourse
Brock, C. A. (1986) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586388 · Cited by 257 · cited 1×
“Thus, all data was counted for c-units, defined as ‘utterances, for example, words, phrases, and sentences, grammatical and ungrammatical, which provide referential or pragmatic meaning to NS–NNS interaction’ (Foster 1998: 8, referring to Pica et al. 1989 and Brock 1986).”
MethodClassroom Learning, Teaching, and Research: A Task‐Based Perspective
PICA, T. (2005) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00309.x · Cited by 179
Research works printed but not linked: 106
- Yule, 1997, Referential communication tasks
- 10.1177/136216880607074599 · DOI
- Van Den Branden, 2007, Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective
- 10.1017/CBO9780511667282 · DOI
- Tavakoli P. (forthcoming). Investigating task difficulty: Learners' and teachers' perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5 · DOI
- Swain M. & Lapkin S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Bygate (eds.), 99–118.
- 10.1093/applin/16.3.371 · DOI · Paper page
- Swain, 1995, Principle and practice in applied linguistics, 125
- 10.1111/1467-9922.00071 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00314.x · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230596429 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100010020 · DOI
- 10.2307/3586992 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01115.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0346-251X(91)90024-J · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/8.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1111/0023-8333.00113 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00011-9 · DOI
- Long, 2007, Problems in SLA, 75
- Long, 1988, Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives, 115
- Long M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass & Madden (eds.), 377–393.
- 10.1093/applin/4.2.126 · DOI
- Swain M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass & Madden (eds.), 235–253.
- Loewen S. (2002). The occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Auckland.
- 10.1191/1362168802lr109xx · DOI
- Lee, 2000, Tasks and communication in language classrooms
- Leaver, 2004, Task-based instruction in foreign language education
- Lantolf, 2006, Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development
- Krashen, 1981, Second language acquisition and second language learning
- Hymes, 1972, Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 35
- 10.1093/elt/cci040 · DOI
- Gass, 2006, Input, interaction and output: An overview, AILA Review, 19, 3, 10.1075/aila.19.03gas · DOI
- Gass, 1997, Input, interaction, and the second language learner
- García Mayo, 2007, Investigating tasks in formal language learning
- 10.1093/applin/21.3.354 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/7.3.257 · DOI
- 10.1093/elt/45.2.98 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658410408667093 · DOI
- 10.1075/lllt.11 · DOI
- Ellis, 1997, SLA research and language teaching
- 10.1093/applin/aml028 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658410408668810 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230522961 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/19.3.334 · DOI · Paper page
- Eckerth J. (2008c). Task-based learner–learner interaction: Investigating learning opportunities, learning processes, and learning outcomes. In Eckerth & Siekmann (eds.), 89–118.
- Eckerth, 2006, Three theses on the pedagogical relevance of second language acquisition research, Dil Dergisi Turkish Language Journal, 130, 18
- 10.1002/9780470756492 · DOI
- Doughty, 2004, Form–meaning connections in second language acquisition, 181
- 10.2307/3588028 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 · DOI
- Coughlan, 1994, Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 173
- 10.1017/S0272263106060104 · DOI
- Brumfit, 1990, Research in the language classroom, 3
- 10.1017/S0272263100005398 · DOI
- Roebuck, 2000, Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 79
- Hatch, 1978, Second language acquisition, 401
- 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00188.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2167/la403.0 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263197002015 · DOI
- 10.1111/0023-8333.00172 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
- Hawkins B. (1985). Is an ‘appropriate response’ always so appropriate? In Gass & Madden (eds.), 162–178.
- 10.1111/1540-4781.00185 · DOI
- Long, 1996, Handbook of second language acquisition, 413
- Bygate, 2001, Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing
- 10.1017/S0272263106060153 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226310000783X · DOI
- Pica, 1998, Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition in social context, 9
- Seedhouse, 2004, The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective
- Pica, 1993, Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice, 9
- 10.1093/applin/19.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/elt/cci001 · DOI
- 10.1093/applin/ami010 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658410208667045 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524469 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263106060116 · DOI
- Gass, 1985, Input in second language acquisition
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x · DOI
- Gass S. (2003). Input and interaction. In Doughty & Long (eds.), 224–255. · DOI · Paper page
- Long, Task-based language teaching
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00465.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Adams, 2007, Conversational interaction in second language acquisition, 29
- Breen, 1987, Language learning tasks, 23
- Eckerth J. (2008b). Task-based language learning and teaching − old wine in new bottles? In Eckerth & Siekmann (eds.), 13–46.
- Wertsch, 1998, Mind as action
- Long, 1987, Patterns of classroom interaction, 137
- Swain, 2005, Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 471
- 10.1017/S027226310606013X · DOI
- Ellis, 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of languages, 79
- 10.1191/1362168805lr163oa · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511667275.006 · DOI
- Allwright, 1991, Focus on the language classroom
- 10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x · DOI
- Gass, 2007, Theories of second language acquisition, 175
- Müller-Hartmann, 2004, Task-based language learning and teaching
- 10.1093/applin/7.2.128 · DOI
- 10.2307/3587607 · DOI · Paper page
- Harris, 2005, Same activity, different focus, Focus on Basics, 8, 7
- Skehan, 1998, A cognitive approach to language learning
- Eckerth, 2008, Research on task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives
- 10.1191/1362168803lr127oa · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interaction and instructed second language acquisition
Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444818000125 · Cited by 377
Incidental vocabulary learning in classroom communication tasks
Newton, J. (2013) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168812460814 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Eckerth, J.
- Venue
- Language Teaching
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-130
- ISSN
- 0261-4448
- 1475-3049
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 10
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review