Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment

Muñoz, Carmen, Singleton, David·2011·Language Teaching
DOI 10.1017/s0261444810000327
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article addresses age-related attainment effects in second language acquisition, posing the question of whether such effects are to be explained in terms of a Critical Period with a predictable and abrupt offset point or in terms of the impact of a wider range of factors. It attempts to explore this question by focusing on four discussion points in the current debate: (i) the wide use of native-speaker behaviour as the key L2 attainment yardstick; (ii) the degree of compatibility of prevailing views regarding the notion of a critical period for L2 acquisition; (iii) the relative narrowness of much research in this area, where age of L2 onset is often regarded as the crucial if not the only critical variable; and (iv) insights relative to maturational constraints on language acquisition offered by recent brain research. The article concludes that a loosening of the association between ultimate L2 attainment research and Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) issues would shed more light on L2 attainment in terms both of the comprehensiveness and of the acuity of the insights which would result.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0261444810000327

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 192

  1. Kalberer U. (2007). Rate of L2 acquisition and the influence of instruction time on achievement. M.Ed. thesis. University of Manchester.
  2. 10.1017/S0272263100012596 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Indefrey P. (2006). A meta-analysis of hemodynamic studies on first and second language processing: Which suggested differences can we trust and what do they mean? In Gullberg & Indefrey (eds.), 279–304. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hyltenstam, 2003, Âge de l'exposition initiale et niveau terminal chez les locuteurs du suédois L2, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 18, 99, 10.4000/aile.1154 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1970.tb00480.x · DOI
  6. García Mayo M. P. (2003). Age, length of exposure and grammaticality judgements in the acquisition of English as a foreign language. In Mayo García & Lecumberri García (eds.), 94–114.
  7. Martohardjono G. & Flynn S. (1995). Is there an age factor for Universal Grammar? In Singleton & Lengyel (eds.), 135–153.
  8. 10.1121/1.428116 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1017/S0272263104261010 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.21832/9781853598937 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Flege, 2002, An integrated view of language development: Papers in honor of Henning Wode, 217
  12. Llanes À. (2010). Children and adults learning English in a study abroad context. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Barcelona.
  13. 10.1007/s10936-009-9104-8 · DOI
  14. Fabbro F. (2002). The neurolinguistics of L2 users. In Cook V. (ed.), 197–218. · doi:10.21832/9781853595851-010
  15. Fabbro, 1999, The neurolinguistics of bilingualism: An introduction
  16. Emmorey, 2002, Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research
  17. Mitchell, 2004, Second language learning theories
  18. 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01044.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1097/00001756-200308260-00003 · DOI
  20. 10.1017/S1366728908004008 · DOI
  21. Long, 2007, Problems in SLA
  22. Bongaerts T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 Learners. In Birdsong (ed.), 133–159.
  23. 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00098.x · DOI
  24. Gullberg, 2006, The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition
  25. 10.1007/BF02143959 · DOI
  26. Cook, 2003, Effects of the second language on the first, 10.21832/9781853596346 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/0271-5309(95)00007-D · DOI
  28. 10.21832/9781853595851 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.2307/3588095 · DOI · Paper page
  30. DeKeyser, 2006, Age in L2 acquisition and teaching, 49
  31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-08-03050.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hellman A. B. (2008). The limits of eventual attainment in adult-onset second language acquisition. Ed.D. Dissertation, Boston University.
  33. Cenoz, 1998, Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education, 16, 10.21832/9781800418073-004 · DOI
  34. Lasagabaster D. & Doiz A. (2003). Maturational constraints on foreign-language written production. In Mayo García & Lecumberri García (eds.), 136–160. · DOI
  35. Kinsella C. (2009). An investigation into the proficiency of successful late learners of French. Ph.D. dissertation. Trinity College Dublin.
  36. Cenoz, 2003, Facteurs determinant l'acquisition d'une L3: âge, développement cognitif et milieu, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 18, 37
  37. Cenoz J. (2002). Age differences in foreign language learning. I. T. L. Review of Applied Linguistics, 135–136, 125–142. · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.008 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0885-2006(02)00165-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1977.tb02979.x · doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1977.tb02979.x
  41. Broca, 1861, Perte de la parole, ramolissement chronique et destruction partielle du lobe antérieur gauche du cerveau, Bulletin de la Societé d'Anthropologie, 11, 235
  42. Bongaerts, 2003, Effets de l'âge sur l'acquisition de la prononciation d'une seconde langue, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère, 18, 79, 10.4000/aile.1153 · DOI
  43. Lambert, 1975, Education of immigrant students, 55
  44. 10.1111/1467-9582.00069 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Davies, 2003, The native speaker: Myth and reality, 10.21832/9781853596247 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/9780470756492 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1017/S0272263199001035 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Flege, 2001, The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527, 10.1017/S0272263101004041 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Major, 1993, Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives, 463
  50. Lundy, 1999, Theory of mind development in deaf children, Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 18, 1
  51. 10.1017/S0267190500200147 · DOI
  52. Cook, 2006, Interlanguage, multi-competence and the problem of the ‘second language’, Rivista di Psicolinguistica Applicata, 6, 39
  53. 10.1006/brln.1999.2186 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Hawkins, 2001, Second language syntax: A generative introduction
  55. García Lecumberri M. L. & Gallardo F. (2003). English FL pronunciation in school students of different ages. In Mayo García & Lecumberri García (eds.), 95–135.
  56. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.329 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/applin/amp059 · DOI
  59. Flege J. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong (ed.), 101–131.
  60. 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Almli, 1987, Sensitive periods in development: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 123
  63. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1974.tb05072.x · DOI
  64. Curtiss, 1977, Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day ‘wild child’
  65. 10.1017/S0272263197004026 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Cook, 2007, Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An introduction
  67. Singleton, 2009, New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching, 109
  68. DeKeyser R. (2003a). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty & Long (eds.), 313–348. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Grosjean, 1982, Life with two languages
  70. Álvarez, 2006, Age and the rate of foreign language learning, 127, 10.21832/9781853598937-008 · DOI
  71. 10.1017/CBO9780511605796 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1017/S014271640999021X · DOI
  73. 10.21832/9781853597596 · DOI
  74. Green, 2003, The interface between syntax and the lexicon in second language acquisition
  75. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0810 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1017/S027226310426209X · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1006/jpho.2000.0104 · DOI
  78. Aram, 1997, From first words to grammar in children with focal brain injury, Developmental Neuropsychology, 13, 275, 10.1080/87565649709540682 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Cummins, 1979, Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters, Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 198
  80. Uylings H. B. M. (2006). Development of the human cortex and the concept of ‘critical’ or ‘sensitive’ periods. In Gullberg & Indefrey (eds.), 59–90. · DOI · Paper page
  81. Torras M. R. , Navés T. , Celaya M. L. , & Pérez-Vidal C. (2006). Age and IL development in writing. In Muñoz (ed.), 156–182.
  82. Muñoz C. (2003). Variation in oral skills development and age of onset. In Mayo García & Lecumberri García (eds.), 101–181. · DOI
  83. 10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.287 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/0167-6393(94)00044-B · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1017/S0142716410000056 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Schick B. & Gale E. (1997). The relationship between theory of mind and language skills in deaf children. Paper presented at the Colorado Symposium on Deafness, October 1997, Copper Mountain, CO.
  87. 10.1353/lan.1992.0035 · doi:10.1353/lan.1992.0035 · Paper page
  88. Scovel, 2006, Age in L2 acquisition and teaching, 31
  89. 10.1017/S0142716403000079 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.193 · DOI
  92. 10.1111/1467-9481.00184 · DOI · Paper page
  93. 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61505-8 · DOI
  94. 10.1002/9780470694138.ch30 · DOI
  95. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0917 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Pavlenko, 2000, Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 155
  97. Bialystok E. & Hakuta K. (1999). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In Birdsong (ed.), 161–181.
  98. 10.1017/S0142716406060024 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Ellis, 1994, The study of second language acquisition
  100. DeKeyser, 2005, Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 88
  101. Cook V. (2002). Background to the L2 user. In Cook V. (ed.), 1–28. · DOI
  102. Penfield, 1959, Speech and brain mechanisms.
  103. Andreou, 2009, The native speaker ideal in foreign language teaching, Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6, 201
  104. 10.1080/14790710408668176 · DOI · Paper page
  105. 10.1017/S0272263102003054 · DOI
  106. 10.1093/cercor/13.2.155 · DOI · Paper page
  107. Kaplan, 1994, Displacements. Cultural identities in question, 59
  108. Thompson, 2001, Critical thinking about critical periods, 83
  109. Bialystok, 1994, In other words: The science and psychology of second language acquisition
  110. 10.1111/1467-9280.00444 · DOI · Paper page
  111. 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.005 · DOI · Paper page
  112. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00521.x · DOI
  113. 10.1017/S0142716400003064 · DOI
  114. 10.1111/1467-9582.00056 · DOI
  115. 10.1159/000028490 · DOI
  116. 10.3109/00016489709117769 · DOI · Paper page
  117. Flege J. E. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske & Young-Scholten (eds.), 175–190.
  118. 10.1177/0267658307082981 · DOI
  119. 10.3138/cmlr.59.2.264 · DOI
  120. 10.1191/026765897677670241 · DOI
  121. 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.05.001 · DOI
  122. 10.1044/jshr.3606.1258 · DOI · Paper page
  123. 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90018-F · DOI · Paper page
  124. 10.1006/jpho.1996.0040 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Miralpeix I. (2006). Age and vocabulary acquisition in English as a foreign language. In Muñoz (ed.), 89–106.
  126. 10.1075/sibil.39 · DOI · Paper page
  127. Mora J. C. (2006). Age effects on oral fluency development. In Muñoz (ed.), 65–88.
  128. 10.1002/9780470757000.ch17 · DOI · Paper page
  129. Morford, 2000, Language acquisition by eye, 111
  130. 10.1002/9780470757000.ch3 · DOI
  131. Moyer, 2004, Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition. An integrated approach to critical period inquiry
  132. 10.1002/hbm.20269 · DOI
  133. 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02224.x · DOI
  134. Marinova-Todd S. H. (2003). Know your grammar: What the knowledge of syntax and morphology in an L2 reveals about the critical period for second/foreign language acquisition. In García Mayo & Lecumberri García (eds.), 59–73.
  135. 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.3.231 · DOI · Paper page
  136. Moyer A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In Piske & Young-Scholten (eds.), 159–174.
  137. Muñoz C. (2006b). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF Project. In Muñoz (ed.), 1–40. · DOI
  138. 10.1093/applin/amm056 · DOI · Paper page
  139. 10.1515/IRAL.2008.009 · DOI
  140. 10.1006/nimg.2001.0781 · DOI · Paper page
  141. Tragant E. & Victori M. (2006). Reported strategy use and age. In Muñoz (ed.), 208–236.
  142. Muñoz C. (in press). Input in foreign language learning: more significant than starting age? In Howard M. (ed.), International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, Monographic issue, Input Perspectives on the Role of Learning Context in SLA.
  143. 10.1075/eurosla.7.10mun · DOI
  144. Ortega L. (2010) The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary presentation given at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) 2010. Atlanta, GA March.
  145. Osterhout L. , McLaughlin J. , Pitkänen I. , Frenck-Mestre C. & Molinaro N. (2006). Novice learner, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. In Gullberg & Indefrey (eds.), 199–230. · DOI · Paper page
  146. Cook V. (1995). Multicompetence and effects of age. In Singleton & Lengyel (eds.), 51–56.
  147. Palmen, 1997, L'authenticité de la prononciation dans l'acquisition d'une langue étrangère au-delà de la période critique: Des apprenants parvenus à un niveau très avancé en français, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 9, 173, 10.4000/aile.742 · DOI
  148. Paradis, 1994, Implicit and explicit learning of second languages, 393
  149. 10.1075/sibil.18 · DOI · Paper page
  150. 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  151. 10.1002/hbm.10110 · DOI · Paper page
  152. Birdsong, 1999, Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 10.4324/9781410601667 · DOI · Paper page
  153. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00151-4 · DOI
  154. Reichle, 2010, Neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic perspectives on SLA, 17
  155. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.047 · DOI
  156. Sabourin L. (2003). Grammatical gender and second language processing: An ERP study. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen.
  157. Sampson, 2005, The ‘Language Instinct’ Debate
  158. 10.2307/3587717 · DOI · Paper page
  159. Scoresby-Jackson, 1867, Case of aphasia with right hemiplegia, Edinburgh Medical Journal, 12, 696
  160. 10.1017/S0267190500200135 · DOI · Paper page
  161. Ullman, 2005, Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice, 141
  162. Singleton, 1995, Second languages in the primary school: The age factor dimension, Teanga: The Irish Yearbook of Applied Linguistics, 15, 155
  163. 10.1515/iral.2005.43.4.269 · DOI · Paper page
  164. Singleton, 1995, The age factor in second language acquisition, 10.21832/9781800418240 · DOI
  165. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  166. DeKeyser, 2000, The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499, 10.1017/S0272263100004022 · DOI · Paper page
  167. García Mayo, 2003, Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language: Theoretical issues and field work, 10.21832/9781853596407 · DOI · Paper page
  168. Snow, 2002, Languages of the brain
  169. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00392.x · DOI
  170. 10.1075/z.73.17kel · DOI
  171. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80804-1 · DOI · Paper page
  172. 10.1038/35094573 · DOI · Paper page
  173. Urponen, 2004, Ultimate attainment in postpuberty second language acquisition
  174. Victori M. & Tragant E. (2003). Learner strategies: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high-school EFL learners. In Mayo García & Lecumberri García (eds.), 182–209.
  175. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01150-9 · DOI · Paper page
  176. 10.1177/026765839601200301 · DOI · Paper page
  177. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01537.x · DOI
  178. 10.1111/1467-8624.00437 · DOI · Paper page
  179. 10.1017/S0261444807004909 · DOI
  180. Singleton D. (1995a). A critical look at the Critical Period Hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In Singleton & Lengyel (eds.), 1–29. · DOI
  181. Kouritzin, 1999, Face[t]s of first language loss, 10.4324/9781410603340 · DOI · Paper page
  182. 10.1515/iral.2010.003 · DOI
  183. 10.1017/S0266078400003473 · DOI
  184. Scovel, 1988, A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human language
  185. 10.1515/iral.2000.38.2.109 · DOI
  186. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1995.tb01303.x · DOI · Paper page
  187. Jia, 1999, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 301
  188. Beretta, 2009, The handbook of language teaching, 65
  189. Piske, 2009, Input matters
  190. 10.1017/S0272263103000159 · DOI · Paper page
  191. Bongaerts T. , Planken B. & Schils E. (1995). Can late starters attain a native accent in a foreign language: A test of the critical period hypothesis. In Singleton & Lengyel (eds.), 30–50. · DOI
  192. Ioup G. (1995). Evaluating the need for input enhancement in post-critical period language acquisition. In Singleton & Lengyel (eds.), 95–123. · DOI

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Muñoz, C., & Singleton, D.
Venue
Language Teaching
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2010-12-03
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
1-35
ISSN
  • 0261-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3049
DOI
10.1017/s0261444810000327
OpenAlex
W2118907198
Cited by
367
References
14
FWCI
84.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0261444810000327
The paper
Muñoz, C., & Singleton, D. (2011). A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444810000327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.