Cited by 146Child Abuse and TraumaResilience and Mental HealthChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Anxiety among adults with a history of childhood adversity: Psychological resilience moderates the indirect effect of emotion dysregulation

Poole, Julia C., Dobson, Keith S., Pusch, Dennis·2017·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been widely identified as risk factors for increased symptoms of anxiety across the lifespan. Little is known, however, about the processes by which ACEs set the stage for increased symptoms of anxiety in adulthood. The current study evaluated whether emotion dysregulation and psychological resilience influence the association between ACEs and symptoms of anxiety. Methods A sample of adult primary care patients (N=4006) completed self-report measures related to ACEs, symptoms of anxiety, emotion dysregulation, and psychological resilience. Results A moderated mediation analysis showed that emotion dysregulation mediated the association between ACEs and anxiety symptoms, and that the strength of this effect varied as a function of psychological resilience. Specifically, the influence of ACEs on emotional dysregulation was stronger among individuals with low levels of psychological resilience than among those with high levels of psychological resilience. These findings remained significant when controlling for a range of sociodemographic variables in the model. Limitations Cross-sectional designs preclude inferences about causality and self-report data may be susceptible to reporting biases. Other psychological variables that may be relevant to the current results, such as protective factors in childhood, were not assessed. Conclusions These results have implications for the conceptualization of ACEs, emotion dysregulation, a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.047

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dobson, K.S., Poole, J.C., Pusch, D., Whitsitt, D., McKay, M., Bhosale, A., 2016. Assessing adverse childhood experiences in primary care settings. Poster presented at the Canadian Collaborative Mental Health Care Conference, Calgary, Alberta (2015, June 18).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poole, J. C., Dobson, K. S., & Pusch, D.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Poole, Julia C.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
217
Pages
144-152
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2599014991
Cited by
145
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
FWCI
12.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, anxiety symptoms, emotional dysregulation, psychological resilience, moderated mediation, causes of anxiety, primary care patients, childhood adversity
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adult, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Resilience, Psychological, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review