Cited by 279Resilience and Mental HealthChild Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family Violence

The resilience portfolio model: Understanding healthy adaptation in victims of violence.

Grych, John, Hamby, Sherry, Banyard, Victoria·2015·Psychology of Violence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0039671

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grych, J., Hamby, S., & Banyard, V.
Affiliations
  • Marquette University (US)
  • Sewanee: The University of the South (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
Venue
Psychology of Violence
Published
2015-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
343-354
ISSN
  • 2152-081X (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-0828
OpenAlex
W2804856400
Cited by
279
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
18.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology of Violence (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
victims of violence, resilience, trauma recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review