Cited by 28Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Symptom differentiation of anxiety and depression across youth development and clinic-referred/nonreferred samples: An examination of competing factor structures of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-oriented scales

Price, Maggi, Higa-McMillan, Charmaine, Ebesutani, Chad, Okamura, Kelsie, Nakamura, Brad J., Chorpita, Bruce F., Weisz, John·2013·Development and Psychopathology

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the DSM-oriented scales of the Child Behavior Checklist (Achenbach, Dumenci, & Rescorla, 2003) using confirmatory factor analysis to compare the six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to competing models consistent with developmental theories of symptom differentiation. We tested these models on both clinic-referred (N = 757) and school-based, nonreferred (N = 713) samples of youths in order to assess the generalizability of the factorial structures. Although previous research has supported the fit of the six-factor DSM-oriented structure in a normative sample of youths ages 7 to 18 (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001), tripartite model research indicates that anxiety and depressive symptomology are less differentiated among children compared to adolescents (Jacques & Mash, 2004). We thus examined the relative fit of a six- and a five-factor model (collapsing anxiety and depression) with younger (ages 7–10) and older (ages 11–18) youth subsamples. The results revealed that the six-factor model fit the best in all samples except among younger nonclinical children. The results extended the generalizability of the rationally derived six-factor structure of the DSM-oriented scales to clinic-referred youths and provided further support to the notion that younger children in nonclinical samples exhibit less differentiated symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0954579413000333

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, M., Higa-McMillan, C., Ebesutani, C., Okamura, K., Nakamura, B. J., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Higa-McMillan, Charmaine
Venue
Development and Psychopathology
Published
2013-11
Volume
25
Issue
4pt1
Pages
1005-1015
ISSN
  • 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2198
OpenAlex
W2333238580
Cited by
28
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
anxiety, depression, symptom differentiation, Child Behavior Checklist, factor structure, tripartite model, youth development, psychometric properties, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Behavior, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review