Cited by 73Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy of Pediastrum duplex: characterization of a micro-population isolated from a eutrophic lake

SIGEE, D. C., DEAN, A., LEVADO, E., TOBIN, M. J.·2002·European Journal of Phycology

Abstract

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was carried out on single colonies of Pediastrum duplex present in air-dried preparations of mixed phytoplankton samples isolated from a eutrophic freshwater lake. FTIR absorption spectra had 12 distinct bands over the wavenumber range 3300–900 cm−1 which were tentatively assigned to a range of chemical groups, including -OH (residual water, wavenumber 3299 cm−1), -CH2 (lipid, 2924), -C=O (cellulose, 1739), amide (protein, 1650 and 1542), >P=O (nucleic acid, 1077) and -C-O (starch, 1151 and 1077). Measurement of band areas identified residual water, protein and starch as the major detectable constituents. Areas of single bands and combined bands of -CH2, -C-O and >P=O species normalized to protein (to correct for differences in specimen hydration and thickness) showed wide variation between colonies, indicating environmental heterogeneity. Correlation analysis demonstrated close statistical associations between different molecular species. Particularly high levels of correlation between bands 3/4 (CH2), 6/7 (amide) and 8/9 (-CH3) was consistent with their joint origin from the same molecular species. The isolation of bands 11 and 12 in the correlation pattern was confirmed by factor analysis, suggesting that variation in the level of starch is statistically unrelated to other macromolecules being monitored. The use of FTIR spectroscopy to characterize an algal micro-population within mixed phytoplankton has potential for future studies on biodiversity and environmental interactions at the species level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0967026201003444

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SIGEE, D. C., DEAN, A., LEVADO, E., & TOBIN, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Daresbury Laboratory (GB)
Venue
European Journal of Phycology
Published
2002-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
19-26
ISSN
  • 0967-0262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4433
OpenAlex
W2152817906
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Phycology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
Pediastrum duplex, green algae, eutrophic lakes, phytoplankton, starch, proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, factor analysis, algal diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review