Cited by 41Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Molecular heterogeneity in Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and Anabaena flos-aquae(Cyanophyta): a synchrotron-based Fourier-transform infrared study of lake micropopulations

Open access
Dean, Andrew P., Sigee, David C.·2006·European Journal of Phycology

Abstract

Synchrotron-based Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy was used to characterize micropopulations of the cyanobacteria Anabaena flos-aquae and Aphanizomenon flos-aquae in mixed phytoplankton samples taken from the epilimnion and hypolimnion of a stratified eutrophic lake (Rostherne Mere, UK). All FTIR spectra (normalized to amide I) showed a closely similar sequence of 10 bands over the wavenumber range 4,000–900 cm−1 and were assigned to a range of vibrationally active chemical groups. Interspecific differences between Anabaena and Aphanizomenon were revealed using correlation and multivariate analysis (principal component analysis, PCA) of the set of individual band intensities. Differences between species (separately for epilimnion and hypolimnion) were also analysed by comparing band intensity means, and by performing PCA over a broad spectral region (1,750–900 cm−1). Comparison of intensity means showed that spectra obtained from epilimnetic algae had significant differences in bands 5–7 and in bands 4, 9 and 10. However, in the spectra obtained from the hypolimnion algae, a different pattern was observed, with significant differences between the species restricted to bands 7–10. PCA of the spectral region 1,750–900 cm−1 also demonstrated interspecific differences in relation to carbohydrate and protein concentrations, with Anabaena displaying higher carbohydrate levels in both the epilimnion and hypolimnion. Intraspecific comparisons of band intensity means for epilimnion and hypolimnion subpopulations demonstrated clear differences in Aphanizomenon, where significant differences were observed between epilimnion (higher carbohydrate concentration compared with protein) and hypolimnion (lower carbohydrate concentration compared with protein) subpopulations. Anabaena however showed only minor differences. PCA comparison of the spectral region 1,750–900 cm−1, followed by data visualization using scores plots and loading plots, also demonstrated quantitative differences. Scores plots resolved the epilimnion and hypolimnion subpopulations in Aphanizomenon (but not Anabaena), with the loading plot showing large differences in carbohydrates, supporting the analysis using discrete peak intensities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09670260600645907

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. LEE, R. (1997). Phycology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  2. LEWIS, R.N. & MCELHANEY, R.N. (1996). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in the study of hydrated lipids and lipid bilayer membranes. In Infrared Spectroscopy of Biomolecules (Mantsch, H.H. and Chapman, D., editors), 159-202. Wiley, Chichester.
  3. NAUMANN, D., SCHULTZ, C.P. & HELM, D. (1996). What can infrared spectroscopy tell us about the structure and composition of intact bacterial cells? In Infrared Spectroscopy of Biomolecules (Mantsch, H.H. and Chapman, D., editors), 279-310. Wiley, Chichester.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dean, A. P., & Sigee, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Sigee, David C.
Venue
European Journal of Phycology
Published
2006-05
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
201-212
ISSN
  • 0967-0262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4433
OpenAlex
W1992762776
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Phycology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
Anabaena flos-aquae, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae, cyanobacteria, molecular heterogeneity, FTIR microspectroscopy, epilimnion, hypolimnion, lake stratification, interspecific differences, intraspecific variation, carbohydrate content, protein content, eutrophic lakes, phytoplankton

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review