Cited by 316Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

The application of micro-FTIR spectroscopy to analyze nutrient stress-related changes in biomass composition of phytoplankton algae

Stehfest, Katja, Toepel, Jörg, Wilhelm, Christian·2005·Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Abstract

Micro-Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to study changes in spectral features of three species of Cyanobacteria (Microcystis aeruginosa, Croococcus minutus, and Nostoc sp.) and two Bacillariophyceae (Cyclotella meneghiniana, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum) in response to nutrient stress. The change of physiological state of the cells was followed during a 4-week starvation period on the basis of physiological key parameters and by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Changes in the integrated FTIR bands of cell spectra assigned to proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and silicate were used to calculate relative biomass composition. The results show that short-term acclimatization become visible at first in pigmentation and photosynthetic efficiency, whereas changes in biomass composition reflect long term modulation in the metabolism. Simultaneous monitoring of short term and long term stress acclimatization showed evidence that the metabolic strategies to cope with increasing nutrient limitation are highly species-specific. This species-specificity can only be resolved in natural phytoplankton samples by single cell techniques. The results show that the FTIR technique has the potential to become applicable for the determination of single cell biomass composition from natural phytoplankton communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stehfest, K., Toepel, J., & Wilhelm, C.
Affiliations
Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Stehfest, Katja
Venue
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
717-726
ISSN
0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058108794
Cited by
316
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Physiology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
FTIR microspectroscopy, nutritional stress, phytoplankton, cyanobacteria, Microcystis aeruginosa, Nostoc, diatoms, Cyclotella meneghiniana, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, starvation, biomass composition, photosynthetic efficiency, pigmentation, single-cell analysis
MeSH terms
Cyanobacteria, Phytoplankton, Sensitivity and Specificity, Species Specificity, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Biomass, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review