Cited by 239Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Psychosocial treatments of behavior symptoms in dementia: a systematic review of reports meeting quality standards

Open access
O'Connor, Daniel W., Ames, David, Gardner, Betina, King, Madeleine·2009·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic review of selected experimental studies of psychosocial treatments of behavioral disturbances in dementia. Psychosocial treatments are defined here as strategies derived from one of three psychologically oriented paradigms (learning theory, unmet needs and altered stress thresholds). METHOD: English language reports published or in press by December 2006 were identified by means of database searches, checks of previous reviews and contact with recognized experts. Papers were appraised with respect to study design, participants' characteristics and reporting details. Because people with dementia often respond positively to personal contact, studies were included only if control conditions entailed similar levels of social attention or if one treatment was compared with another. RESULTS: Only 25 of 118 relevant studies met every specification. Treatment proved more effective than an attention control condition in reducing behavioral symptoms in only 11 of the 25 studies. Effect sizes were mostly small or moderate. Treatments with moderate or large effect sizes included aromatherapy, ability-focused carer education, bed baths, preferred music and muscle relaxation training. CONCLUSIONS: Some psychosocial interventions appear to have specific therapeutic properties, over and above those due to the benefits of participating in a clinical trial. Their effects were mostly small to moderate with a short duration of action. This limited action means that treatments will work best in specific, time-limited situations. In the few studies that addressed within-group differences, there were marked variations in response. Some participants benefited greatly from a treatment, while others did not. Interventions proved more effective when tailored to individuals' preferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610208007588

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Connor, D. W., Ames, D., Gardner, B., & King, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
225-240
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141280598
Cited by
239
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 29
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
dementia, behavioral symptoms, psychosocial interventions, behavioral problems, aromatherapy, caregiver education, music therapy, muscle relaxation training, bed bath, treatment response variability, personalized treatment
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Behavior Therapy, Mental Disorders, Dementia, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Music Therapy, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Homes, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Relaxation Therapy, Socioenvironmental Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Aromatherapy, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review