Cited by 91Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Psychosocial Interventions for Late-life Major Depression: Evidence-Based Treatments, Predictors of Treatment Outcomes, and Moderators of Treatment Effects

Open access
Kiosses, Dimitris N., Leon, Andrew C., Areán, Patricia A.·2011·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for the acute treatment of late-life depression and identifies predictors of treatment outcomes and moderators of treatment effects. Problem-solving therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and treatment initiation and participation program have supportive evidence of efficacy, pending replication. Although the data on predictors of treatment outcomes and moderators of treatment effects are preliminary, it appears that baseline anxiety and stress level, personality disorders, endogenous depression, and reduced self-rated health predict worse depression outcomes. Future research may examine the moderating effects of baseline depression severity and identify other clinical or demographic moderators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psc.2011.03.001

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [79]Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw BF Emery G Cognitive Therapy of Depression 1979 New York Guildford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kiosses, D. N., Leon, A. C., & Areán, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Kiosses, Dimitris N.
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
377-401
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968743793
Cited by
91
References
123
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091045, K23MH074659)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
geriatric depression, psychosocial interventions, problem-solving therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, predictors of treatment outcome, treatment moderators, baseline anxiety, stress, personality disorders, endogenous depression, self-rated health, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Cognition, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Problem Solving, Psychotherapy, Social Support, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review