Cited by 126Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArt Therapy and Mental HealthGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Psychosocial treatments of psychological symptoms in dementia: a systematic review of reports meeting quality standards

Open access
O'Connor, Daniel W., Ames, David, Gardner, Betina, King, Madeleine·2009·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

Background: This paper provides a systematic review of selected experimental studies of the effectiveness of psychosocial treatments in reducing psychological symptoms in dementia (e.g. anxiety, depression, irritability and social withdrawal).Method: English language reports published or in press by February 2008 were identified by means of database searches and checks of previous reviews. Reports were appraised with respect to study design, participants' characteristics and reporting details. Because people with dementia often respond positively to personal contact, studies were included only if control conditions entailed similar levels of social attention or if one treatment was compared with another.Results: Only 12 of 48 relevant papers met every specification. Treatments proved more effective in reducing psychological symptoms than an attention control condition or another treatment in only six of the 12 selected studies. Interventions with moderate effect sizes included music and recreation therapy.Conclusions: Some psychosocial interventions appear to have specific therapeutic properties, over and above those due to the benefits of participating in a clinical trial. Their effects were generally modest with an unknown duration of action. This limited efficacy suggests that treatments will work best in specific, time-limited situations, tailored to individuals' requirements. There is no preferred method to rate psychological symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610208008223

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Connor, D. W., Ames, D., Gardner, B., & King, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
241-251
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4234306167
Cited by
126
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • University of New South Wales
  • Dementia Collaborative Research Centres, Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dementia, psychosocial interventions, psychological symptoms, anxiety, depression, irritability, social withdrawal, music therapy, therapeutic recreation, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review