Cited by 75Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Caregivers of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a review of burden, problems, needs, and interventions

Open access
Nunnemann, Sabine, Kurz, Alexander, Leucht, Stefan, Diehl-Schmid, Janine·2012·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a relatively rare disease compared to Alzheimer' disease (AD), but nevertheless causes higher burden and stress to caregivers. Only little is known about the problems and needs of the caregivers of patients with FTLD. Such information is crucial for the development of caregiver support interventions. The aim of the current study is to systematically review publications on (1) burden, problems, and needs of FTLD caregivers, and (2) the feasibility and efficacy of caregiver interventions in FTLD. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted. Medical, psychological, and social sciences databases were searched for publications on burden, problems, needs of FTLD caregivers, and support interventions. RESULTS: Very little published data are available on burden, problems, and needs of FTLD caregivers. Burden among FTLD caregivers is higher than among AD caregivers and correlated with neuropsychiatric symptoms. Specific problems include delayed diagnosis, young age of patients, behavioral disturbances, lack of information and suitable care facilities, caregivers' depression, social isolation, and neglect of personal needs. Hardly any literature is available on the actual needs of FTLD caregivers. Regarding interventions for caregivers, no randomized controlled trials exist. Eight publications could be identified that provide narrative reports on structured caregiver support groups or respite care in combination with caregiver support intervention or advanced practice nursing. CONCLUSION: More research and funding are needed to elucidate the complex construct of burden of FTLD caregivers to identify and quantify their problems and needs in order to develop helpful interventions and services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s104161021200035x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunnemann, S., Kurz, A., Leucht, S., & Diehl-Schmid, J.
Affiliations
TUM Klinikum (DE)
Corresponding author
Nunnemann, Sabine
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
24
Issue
9
Pages
1368-1386
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143173834
Cited by
75
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
frontotemporal lobar degeneration, caregiver burden, caregiver needs, caregiver support interventions, caregiver depression, social isolation, neuropsychiatric symptoms, behavioral problems, delayed diagnosis, respite care, caregiver support groups, advanced practice nursing, care facilities
MeSH terms
Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review