Cited by 459Mental Health Research TopicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The wear-and-tear of daily stressors on mental health

Open access
Charles, Susan T., Piazza, Jennifer R., Mogle, Jacqueline, Sliwinski, Martin J., Almeida, David M.·2013·Psychological Science

Abstract

Researchers assert that affective responses to seemingly minor daily events have long-term implications for mental health, yet this phenomenon has rarely been investigated. In the current study, we examined how levels of daily negative affect and affective reactivity in response to daily stressors predicted general affective distress and self-reported anxiety and depressive disorders 10 years after they were first assessed. Across eight consecutive evenings, participants (N = 711; age = 25 to 74 years) reported their daily stressors and their daily negative affect. Increased levels of negative affect on nonstressor days were related to general affective distress and symptoms of an affective disorder 10 years later. Heightened affective reactivity to daily stressors predicted greater general affective distress and an increased likelihood of reporting an affective disorder. These findings suggest that the average levels of negative affect that people experience and how they respond to seemingly minor events in their daily lives have long-term implications for their mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797612462222

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A bout of exercise on any day can dampen the affective response to stressors, perhaps protecting from stress related depression and disease.

    “A bout of exercise on any day can dampen the affective response to stressors (Puterman et al., 2017), perhaps protecting from stress related depression and disease (Piazza et al., 2013; Charles et al., 2013).”

    From More than a feeling: A unified view of stress measurement for population science (2018) · cites this paper as Charles et al., 2013

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that heightened affective reactivity to daily stressors predicted greater distress and a higher likelihood of reporting an affective disorder 10 years later. This supports the proposed link to depression, but the paper does not establish protection from physical disease. The exercise effect is attributed to Puterman et al., not Charles et al. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Modified MBCT has been shown effective in reducing depressive symptoms, anxiety, and/or stress in older adults.

    “Modified MBCT has been shown effective in reducing depressive symptoms, anxiety, and/or stress in older adults [1–4].”

    From Effectiveness of an age-modified mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in improving mental health in older people with depressive symptoms: a non-randomised controlled trial. (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Method section describes a longitudinal study of daily stressors and measures of depressive and anxiety symptoms, not an MBCT intervention. Searches for modified MBCT, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, and intervention effects in older adults found no passage addressing its effectiveness; no page numbers were available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charles, S. T., Piazza, J. R., Mogle, J., Sliwinski, M. J., & Almeida, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • California State University, Fullerton (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2013-03-26
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
733-741
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2140727693
Cited by
459
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 5
FWCI
36.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG03949, P01AG003949, P01AG020166, R01AG019239)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041025)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
daily hassles, negative affect, emotional reactivity, emotional distress, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, mood disorders, longitudinal follow-up, daily life events, mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, United States, Causality, Odds Ratio, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review