Cited by 58Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Metacognitive therapy in treatment-resistant psychosis: a multiple-baseline study.

Open access
Hutton, Paul, Morrison, Anthony P., Wardle, Melissa, Wells, Adrian·2014·Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More effective psychological treatments for psychosis are required. Case series data and pilot trials suggest metacognitive therapy (MCT) is a promising treatment for anxiety and depression. Other research has found negative metacognitive beliefs and thought-control strategies may be involved in the development and maintenance of hallucinations and delusions. The potential of MCT in treating psychosis has yet to be investigated. AIMS: Our aim was to find out whether a short number of MCT sessions would be associated with clinically significant and sustained improvements in delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, depression and subjective recovery in patients with treatment-resistant long-standing psychosis. METHOD: Three consecutively referred patients, each with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and continuing symptoms, completed a series of multiple baseline assessments. Each then received between 11 and 13 sessions of MCT and completed regular assessments of progress, during therapy, post-therapy and at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Two out of 3 participants achieved clinically significant reductions across a range of symptom-based outcomes at end-of-therapy. Improvement was sustained at 3-month follow-up for one participant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility of using MCT with people with medication-resistant psychosis. MCT was acceptable to the participants and associated with meaningful change. Some modifications may be required for this population, after which a controlled trial may be warranted.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1352465812001026

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wells's Metacognitive Therapy aims to reduce toxic thinking styles such as worry and threat monitoring believed to maintain paranoid thoughts and hallucinations by changing dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and practicing metacognitive strategies like detached mindfulness.

    “Similar to defusion techniques, Well’s Metacognitive Therapy aims to reduce toxic thinking styles such as worry and threat monitoring believed to maintain paranoid thoughts and hallucinations by changing dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs and practicing metacognitive strategies like detached mindfulness (124).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [124]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutton, P., Morrison, A. P., Wardle, M., & Wells, A.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Hutton, Paul
Venue
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
Published
2013-01-03
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
166-185
ISSN
  • 1352-4658 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1833
OpenAlex
W1995613446
Cited by
58
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
metacognitive therapy, treatment-resistant psychosis, paranoid schizophrenia, delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, depression, metacognitive beliefs, thought control strategies, subjective recovery, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Delusions, Depressive Disorder, Drug Resistance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Paranoid, Antipsychotic Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review