Cited by 101Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsMental Health and Psychiatry

Metacognitive and cognitive-behavioral interventions for psychosis: new developments.

Open access
Moritz, Steffen, Klein, Jan Philipp, Lysaker, Paul H., Mehl, Stephanie·2019·Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

This review describes four cognitive approaches for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp), metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, and metacognitive reflection insight therapy (MERIT). A central reference point of our review is a seminal paper by James Flavell, who introduced the term metacognition ("cognition about cognition"). In a way, every psychotherapeutic approach adopts a metacognitive perspective when therapists reflect with clients about their thoughts. Yet, the four approaches map onto different components of metacognition. CBTp conveys some "metacognitive knowledge" (eg, thoughts are not facts) but is mainly concerned with individual beliefs. Metacognitive therapy focuses on unhelpful metacognitive beliefs about thinking styles (eg, thought suppression). Metacognitive training brings distorted cognitive biases to the awareness of patients; a central goal is the reduction of overconfidence. MERIT focuses on larger senses of identity and highlights metacognitive knowledge about oneself and other persons. For CBTp and metacognitive training, meta-analytic evidence supports their efficacy; single studies speak for the effectiveness of MERIT and metacognitive therapy. .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31887/dcns.2019.21.3/smoritz

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in metacognitive knowledge and awareness are believed to lead to cognitive distortions, dysfunctional beliefs and expectancies, and a lack of cognitive insight into cognitive biases.

    “Deficits in metacognitive knowledge and awareness moreover are believed to lead to cognitive distortions (e.g., jumping to conclusions, attributional biases, theory of mind deficits) (60), dysfunctional beliefs and expectancies (associated with a low self-esteem and negative symptoms) (10, 95) and a lack of cognitive insight into those cognitive biases (96).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [60]

    The citation is attached to the cognitive-distortions clause, not the later claims about dysfunctional beliefs or cognitive insight. In “Metacognitive training for psychosis” (page unavailable), the review identifies jumping to conclusions, theory of mind and attributional style as relevant biases and says patients’ awareness of these biases is often poor. It does not say that deficits in metacognitive knowledge and awareness lead to those distortions. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Compared to Metacognitive Therapy by Wells and Matthews, MCT focuses not only on general thinking mechanisms from a metacognitive perspective but also on specific thoughts from a cognitive one by directly addressing thought contents.

    “Compared to Metacognitive Therapy by Wells and Matthews, MCT not only focuses on general thinking mechanisms from a metacognitive perspective, but also on specific thoughts from a cognitive one by directly addressing thought contents (60).”

    From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [60]

    The “Metacognitive training for psychosis” section says MCT raises awareness of cognitive biases and that its recent depression and self-esteem modules have a CBTp signature. But it also says MCT’s authors dispute the general characterization that the intervention deals with the content of negative thoughts. The claim overgeneralizes that content-focused aspect to MCT as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The concept of MCT by Moritz and Woodward was originally inspired by research on cognitive biases in psychosis and aims to convey metacognitive knowledge and raise metacognitive awareness for dysfunctional thought patterns.

    “The concept of MCT by Moritz and Woodward was originally inspired by research on cognitive biases in psychosis (65) and aims to convey metacognitive knowledge and raise metacognitive awareness for dysfunctional thought patterns (60, 122).”
  • MCT was originally developed for psychosis but has been adapted for treating other disorders such as depression and personality disorders and can be applied transdiagnostically.

    “Although MCT was originally developed for psychosis, it has been adapted for use in treating other disorders such as depression and personality disorders and can be applied in a transdiagnostic manner (60).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [1]Fowler D Garety P Kuipers E 1995 Chichester, UK Wiley
  2. [2]Fisher P Wells A 2009 Sussex, UK Routledge
  3. [9]Koriat A Perfect TJ Schwartz BL Metacognition research: An interim report 2002 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 261 286
  4. [10]Chadwick P Birchwood M Trower P 1996 Chichester, UK Wiley
  5. [12]Morrison A Renton J Dunn H Williams S Bentall R 2004 New York, NY Routledge
  6. [17]Morris E Johns L Oliver J 2013 London, UK Wiley
  7. [18]Chadwick P 2006 London Wiley
  8. [21]Gaebel W Alkomiet H Falkai P 2019 Berlin, Germany Springer
  9. [35]Wells A 2009 New York Guilford Press
  10. [36]Wells A Fisher PL Wells A Fisher PL Metacognitive therapy: theoretical background and model of depression. 2016 Chichester (UK) John Wiley & Sons 144 168
  11. [56]Lysaker PH Klion R. 2017 New York, NY Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moritz, S., Klein, J. P., Lysaker, P. H., & Mehl, S.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Moritz, Steffen
Venue
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
309-317
ISSN
  • 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1958-5969
OpenAlex
W2990591564
Cited by
101
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Gesundheit
  • Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
psychosis, schizophrenia, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, metacognitive therapy, metacognitive training, metacognition, metacognitive beliefs, thought suppression, cognitive biases, overconfidence, identity, psychotherapy efficacy
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review