Cited by 1,166Aging and Gerontology ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective review of cognitive aging

Open access
SALTHOUSE, TIMOTHY A.·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Research concerned with relations between adult age and cognitive functioning is briefly reviewed. The coverage is necessarily selective, and is organized in terms of five major questions. These are what abilities are related to age, how many distinct influences are contributing to the relations between age and cognitive functioning, do the differences between people increase with advancing age, what is responsible for the discrepancies between cross-sectional and longitudinal age comparisons of cognitive functioning, and what methods can be used to identify causes of age-related influences on cognition. Although definitive answers are not yet possible, quite a bit of information relevant to the questions is now available. Moreover, the existing information has implications for the design, analysis, and interpretation of cognitive and neuropsychological research concerned with aging. ( JINS , 2010, 16 , 754–760.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617710000706

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Craik, 2008, Handbook of cognitive aging

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
SALTHOUSE, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
SALTHOUSE, TIMOTHY A.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2010-08-02
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
754-760
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2077435037
Cited by
1,166
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R37 024270)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG024270)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
cognitive aging, age-related cognitive decline, individual differences in aging
MeSH terms
Aging, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review