CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Second language learning success revealed by brain networks

LI, PING, GRANT, ANGELA·2016·Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
DOI 10.1017/s1366728915000280
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A recent movement in cognitive neuroscience is the study of brain networks through functional and effective connectivity. The brain networks approach has already found its influences in the study of the neurobiology of language, but has yet to impact research in the neurocognition of bilingualism and second language. In this article, we briefly review some preliminary evidence in this emerging field and suggest that the understanding of the dynamic changes in brain networks enables us to capture second language learning success, thereby providing new insights into the neural bases of individual differences, neuroplasticity, and bilingualism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1366728915000280

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain connectivity networks can serve as a reliable predictor for learning both L2 novel words and (artificial) grammar/sequence rules in different learning contexts.

    “A series of studies conducted by Li and colleagues in their lab at Pennsylvania State University have amply demonstrated that brain connectivity networks can indeed serve as a reliable predictor for learning both L2 novel words and (artificial) grammar/sequence rules in different learning contexts”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Li & Grant 2015

  • Neurobiological perspectives have produced the most compelling evidence for the critical role of phonological working memory in essential aspects of L2 learning, including phonology, vocabulary, and grammar/sequence rules.

    “the neurobiological perspectives (such as those studies conducted by Golestani and Yang) have produced the most compelling evidence for the critical role of phonological working memory in essential aspects of L2 learning, including phonology, vocabulary, and grammar/sequence rules”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Li & Grant 2015

  • Findings from brain-based neurological studies have increasingly become an important source of evidence that complements the earlier dependence on behavioural research conventions.

    “Findings from these brain-based neurological studies have increasingly become an important source of evidence that complements the earlier dependence on behavioural research conventions (Schumann 2004;Li & Grant 2015).”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Li & Grant 2015

  • Such research may provide clues as to possible brain localization and neural substrates linked to performance on explicit or implicitly oriented aptitude tests.

    “Such research may provide clues as to possible brain localization and neural substrates linked to performance on explicit or implicitly oriented aptitude tests (Li & Grant 2015).”

    From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Li & Grant 2015

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Elman, 1996, Rethinking innateness, 10.7551/mitpress/5929.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020963 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042993 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00708.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158 · DOI · Paper page
  6. McClelland, 1986, Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition
  7. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Li, 2015, Handbook of language emergence, 511, 10.1002/9781118346136.ch23 · DOI
  9. Bates, 1999, The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders, 214, 10.1093/oso/9780195121933.003.0010 · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0142716406060322 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/cercor/bhk001 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nrn2575 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/hbm.20330 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.019 · DOI
  17. 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01116 · DOI
  19. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.638 · DOI
  21. 10.1017/S1366728907002878 · DOI
  22. Li, 2015, The Cambridge handbook of bilingual processing
  23. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.117 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00828 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199828111.001.0001 · DOI
  27. 10.1162/jocn_a_00210 · DOI
  28. Miyake, 1998, Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistics studies on training and retention, 339
  29. Rumelhart, 1989, Foundations of cognitive science, 298
  30. Sporns, 2011, Networks of the brain
  31. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.064 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.1018985108 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1093/cercor/bhl003 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4655-12.2013 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.010 · DOI
  38. 10.1162/089892903770007407 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.09.004 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.005 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.051 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Fodor, 1983, The Modularity of Mind, 10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
LI, P., & GRANT, A.
Venue
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2015-06-22
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
657-664
ISSN
  • 1366-7289
  • 1469-1841
DOI
10.1017/s1366728915000280
Cited by
30
References
7
Language
en
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review