The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microfabricated Centrifugal Microfluidic Systems: Characterization and Multiple Enzymatic Assays
Abstract
This paper describes a microfluidic system in which fluids are pumped by centrifugal force through microscopic channels defined in a plastic disk in order to perform complex analytical processes. The channels are created either by casting poly(dimethylsiloxane) against molds fabricated by photolithography or by conventional machining of poly(methyl methyacrylate). The channels have a wide range of diameters (5 μm−0.5 mm) and depths (16 μm−3 mm). Fluids are loaded into reservoirs near the center of the disk, the disk is rotated on the shaft of a simple motor at 60−3000 rpm, and the fluids are pumped outward by centrifugal force through microfluidic networks. The control of flow in the time domain, i.e., gating, is achieved by the use of passive valves based on capillary forces. Flow rates ranging from 5 nL/s to >0.1 mL/s have been achieved using channels of different dimensions and different rates of rotation. The method of pumping is insensitive to many physicochemical properties of the liquid, such as pH and ionic strength, so it has been possible to pump biological fluids, such as blood and urine, a buffer containing a detergent, and some organic solvents. A system that performs multiple (48) enzymatic assays simultaneously using colorimetric detection on a dedicated instrument has been demonstrated. These integrated assays have been used both to yield the Michaelis constant ( K m ) of an enzyme and to determine the dose response of an enzyme to a drug. The fluid pumping and control embodied in this system may be readily integrated with other analytical components (e.g., heating, detection, and informatics) to form the basis for a microscale total analysis system for use in genomics, proteomics, high-throughput screening, and molecular diagnostics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications
Mark, D., Haeberle, S., Roth, G., von Stetten, F., & Zengerle, R. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b820557b · Cited by 1,647
Centrifugal microfluidics for biomedical applications
Gorkin, R., Park, J., Siegrist, J., Amasia, M., Lee, B. S., Park, J.-M., Kim, J., Kim, H., Madou, M., & Cho, Y.-K. (2010) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b924109d · Cited by 731
Microfluidic chips for clinical and forensic analysis
Verpoorte, E. (2002) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/1522-2683(200203)23:5<677::aid-elps677>3.0.co;2-8 · Cited by 526
The centrifugal microfluidic Bio-Disk platform
Ducrée, J., Haeberle, S., Lutz, S., Pausch, S., Stetten, F. V., & Zengerle, R. (2007) · Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering · doi:10.1088/0960-1317/17/7/s07 · Cited by 405
Du, W., Li, L., Nichols, K. P., & Ismagilov, R. F. (2009) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b908978k · Cited by 351
Lab-on-valve: universal microflow analyzer based on sequential and bead injection
Ruzicka, J. (2000) · The Analyst · doi:10.1039/b001125h · Cited by 326
Isolation of plasma from whole blood using planar microfilters for lab-on-a-chip applications
Crowley, T. A., & Pizziconi, V. (2005) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b502930a · Cited by 280
Microfluidic systems in proteomics
Lion, N., Rohner, T. C., Dayon, L., Arnaud, I. L., Damoc, E., Youhnovski, N., Wu, Z., Roussel, C., Josserand, J., Jensen, H., et al. (2003) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200305629 · Cited by 262
Thompson, B. L., Ouyang, Y., Duarte, G. R. M., Carrilho, E., Krauss, S. T., & Landers, J. P. (2015) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2015.051 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffy, D. C., Gillis, H. L., Lin, J., Sheppard, N. F., & Kellogg, G. J.
- Venue
- Analytical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-09-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 4669-4678
- ISSN
- 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6882
- OpenAlex
- W2001661282
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.