Cited by 650Photodynamic Therapy Research StudiesNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry

Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizers: From Molecular Design to Applications in the Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer

Nguyen, Van-Nghia, Yan, Yuxin, Zhao, Jianzhang, Yoon, Juyoung·2021·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Conspectus Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically approved therapeutic modality that has shown great potential for the treatment of cancers owing to its excellent spatiotemporal selectivity and inherently noninvasive nature. However, PDT has not reached its full potential, partly due to the lack of ideal photosensitizers. A common molecular design strategy for effective photosensitizers is to incorporate heavy atoms into photosensitizer structures, causing concerns about elevated dark toxicity, short triplet-state lifetimes, poor photostability, and the potentially high cost of heavy metals. To address these drawbacks, a significant advance has been devoted to developing advanced smart photosensitizers without the use of heavy atoms to better fit the clinical requirements of PDT. Over the past few years, heavy-atom-free nonporphyrinoid photosensitizers have emerged as an innovative alternative class of PSs due to their superior photophysical and photochemical properties and lower expense. Heavy-atom-free nonporphyrinoid photosensitizers have been widely explored for PDT purposes and have shown great potential for clinical oncologic applications. Although many review articles about heavy-atom-free photosensitizers based on porphyrinoid structure have been published, no specific review articles have yet focused on the heavy-atom-free nonporphyrinoid photosensitizers. In this account, the specific concept related to heavy-atom-free photosensitizers and the advantageous properties of heavy-atom-free photosensitizers for cancer theranostics will be briefly introduced. In addition, recent progress in the development of heavy-atom-free photosensitizers, ranging from molecular design approaches to recent innovative types of heavy-atom-free nonporphyrinoid photosensitizers, emphasizing our own research, will be presented. The main molecular design approaches to efficient heavy-atom-free PSs can be divided into six groups: (1) the approach based on traditional tetrapyrrole structures, (2) spin–orbit charge-transfer intersystem crossing (SOCT-ISC), (3) reducing the singlet–triplet energy gap (Δ E ST ), (4) the thionation of carbonyl groups of conventional fluorophores, (5) twisted π-conjugation system-induced intersystem crossing, and (6) radical-enhanced intersystem crossing. The innovative types of heavy-atom-free nonporphyrinoid photosensitizers and their applications in cancer diagnostics and therapeutics will be discussed in detail in the third section. Finally, the challenges that need to be addressed to develop optimal heavy-atom-free photosensitizers for oncologic photodynamic therapy and a perspective in this research field will be provided. We believe that this review will provide general guidance for the future design of innovative photosensitizers and spur preclinical and clinical studies for PDT-mediated cancer treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00606

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite significant progress of Ru complexes in the biomedical field, their applications in deep-tissue imaging and efficient cancer therapy are constrained by limitations such as visible-light excitation/emission properties and single chemotherapy/phototherapy modality.

    “Despite significant progress of Ru complexes in the biomedical field, their applications in deep-tissue imaging and efficient cancer therapy are constrained by limitations such as visible-light excitation/emission properties and single chemotherapy/phototherapy modality242,243.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, V.-N., Yan, Y., Zhao, J., & Yoon, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry and Nanoscience, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea
  • Dalian University of Technology (CN)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Zhao, Jianzhang
  • Yoon, Juyoung
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2020-12-08
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
207-220
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W3111073034
Cited by
650
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 132 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 65
FWCI
40.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accounts of Chemical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2012R1A3A2048814)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21673031, 21761142005, 21911530095)
  • State key laboratory of fine chemicals, Dalian University of Technology (ZYTS201901)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Keywords
photodynamic therapy, cancer theranostics, molecular design, singlet-triplet energy gap
MeSH terms
Boron, Boron Compounds, Humans, Light, Neoplasms, Photochemotherapy, Pyrroles, Quantum Theory, Drug Design, Photosensitizing Agents, Singlet Oxygen, Naphthalimides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review