Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,067

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrolytic CO2 Reduction in a Flow Cell

Weekes, David M., Salvatore, Danielle A., Reyes, Angelica, Huang, Aoxue, Berlinguette, Curtis P.·2018·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Conspectus Electrocatalytic CO 2 conversion at near ambient temperatures and pressures offers a potential means of converting waste greenhouse gases into fuels or commodity chemicals (e.g., CO, formic acid, methanol, ethylene, alkanes, and alcohols). This process is particularly compelling when driven by excess renewable electricity because the consequent production of solar fuels would lead to a closing of the carbon cycle. However, such a technology is not currently commercially available. While CO 2 electrolysis in H-cells is widely used for screening electrocatalysts, these experiments generally do not effectively report on how CO 2 electrocatalysts behave in flow reactors that are more relevant to a scalable CO 2 electrolyzer system. Flow reactors also offer more control over reagent delivery, which includes enabling the use of a gaseous CO 2 feed to the cathode of the cell. This setup provides a platform for generating much higher current densities ( J ) by reducing the mass transport issues inherent to the H-cells. In this Account, we examine some of the systems-level strategies that have been applied in an effort to tailor flow reactor components to improve electrocatalytic reduction. Flow reactors that have been utilized in CO 2 electrolysis schemes can be categorized into two primary architectures: Membrane-based flow cells and microfluidic reactors. Each invoke different dynamic mechanisms for the delivery of gaseous CO 2 to electrocatalytic sites, and both have been demonstrated to achieve high current densities ( J > 200 mA cm –2 ) for CO 2 reduction. One strategy common to both reactor architectures for improving J is the delivery of CO 2 to the cathode in the gas phase rather than dissolved in a liquid electrolyte. This physical facet also presents a number of challenges that go beyond the nature of the electrocatalyst, and we scrutinize how the judicious selection and modification of certain components in microfluidic and/or membrane-based reactors can have a profound effect on electrocatalytic performance. In membrane-based flow cells, for example, the choice of either a cation exchange membrane (CEM), anion exchange membrane (AEM), or a bipolar membrane (BPM) affects the kinetics of ion transport pathways and the range of applicable electrolyte conditions. In microfluidic cells, extensive studies have been performed upon the properties of porous carbon gas diffusion layers, materials that are equally relevant to membrane reactors. A theme that is pervasive throughout our analyses is the challenges associated with precise and controlled water management in gas phase CO 2 electrolyzers, and we highlight studies that demonstrate the importance of maintaining adequate flow cell hydration to achieve sustained electrolysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 1,067

Metadata

Authors
Weekes, D. M., Salvatore, D. A., Reyes, A., Huang, A., & Berlinguette, C. P.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
910-918
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2793607420
Cited by
1,067
References
13
FWCI
20.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrolytic CO2 Reduction in a Flow Cell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010
The paper
Weekes, D. M., Salvatore, D. A., Reyes, A., Huang, A., & Berlinguette, C. P. (2018). Electrolytic CO2 Reduction in a Flow Cell. Accounts of Chemical Research. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.