Cited by 74Electrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

Toward the Detection and Identification of Single Bacteria by Electrochemical Collision Technique

Gao, Guanyue, Wang, Dengchao, Brocenschi, Ricardo, Zhi, Jinfang, Mirkin, Michael V.·2018·Analytical Chemistry

Abstract

Fast and cost-efficient detection and identification of bacteria in food and water samples and biological fluids is an important challenge in bioanalytical chemistry. It was shown recently that bacteria can be detected by measuring the decrease in the diffusion current to the ultramicroelectrode caused by cell collisions with its surface. To add selectivity to the bacteria detection, herein we show the possibility of collision experiments with the signal produced by electrochemical activity of bacterial cells reducing (or oxidizing) redox species. The mediator oxidation/reduction rate can be used to identify different types of bacteria based on their specific redox activities. Here we report the analysis of electrochemical collision transients produced by two kinds of bacteria, Escherichia coli and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. The effects of the charge and redox activity of bacterial cells on collision events are discussed. The current transients due to live cell collisions were compared to those produced by bacteria killed either by heavy metal ions (cobalt) or by an antibiotic (colistin). This approach is potentially useful for evaluating the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents. Finite-element simulations were carried out to model collision transients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03043

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The flux of Fe(II) produced by a single bacterium is much too low to be detected in the i-t curve.

    “The resulting current increases with the number of adsorbed bacteria (Fig. 2a) but the flux of Fe(II) produced by a single bacterium is much too low to be detected in the i-t curve [28].”
  • In the S. maltophilia/Ru(NH3)6 3+ setup, the signal is harder to interpret because of two opposite processes occurring simultaneously: blockage of Ru(NH3)6 3+ diffusion to the UME and regeneration of this species by the adsorbed cells.

    “As indicated by the authors, this experimental setup is more complicated and the signal is harder to interpret because of two opposite processes occurring simultaneously: the blockage of the Ru(NH 3 ) 6 3+ diffusion to the UME and the regeneration of this species by the adsorbed cells (Fig. 2b) [28].”
  • Fe(III) is reduced by E. coli bacteria colliding with the UME surface and the produced Fe(II) species get oxidized back at the UME.

    “In this case, Fe(III) is reduced by the E.coli bacteria colliding with the UME surface and the produced Fe(II) species get oxidized back at the UME (Fig. 2a) [28].”
  • The redox activity of E. coli cells has been detected via the ability of these bacteria to reduce ferricyanide species in a 100 mM K3Fe(CN)6 solution with a Pt UME polarized at the oxidation potential of ferrocyanide.

    “Indeed, the redox activity of E. coli cells has been detected via the ability of these bacteria to reduce ferricyanide species in a 100 mM K 3 Fe(CN) 6 solution with a Pt UME polarized at the oxidation potential of ferrocyanide (Fig. 2a) [28].”
  • The resulting current increases with the number of adsorbed bacteria in the E. coli/ferricyanide system.

    “The resulting current increases with the number of adsorbed bacteria (Fig. 2a) but the flux of Fe(II) produced by a single bacterium is much too low to be detected in the i-t curve [28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bard, A. J.; Boika, A.; Kwon, S. J.; Park, J. H.; Thorgaard, S. N. Stochastic Events in Nanoelectrochemical Systems. In Nanoelectrochemistry; Mirkin, M. V., Amemiya, S., Eds. CRC Press: New York, 2015; pp 241–291.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, G., Wang, D., Brocenschi, R., Zhi, J., & Mirkin, M. V.
Affiliations
  • Queens College, CUNY (US)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Mirkin, Michael V.
Venue
Analytical Chemistry
Published
2018-09-13
Volume
90
Issue
20
Pages
12123-12130
ISSN
  • 0003-2700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6882
OpenAlex
W2892290372
Cited by
74
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE-1416116)
  • China Scholarship Council (201604910870)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Electrochemistry › Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
single-bacteria detection, bacterial identification, Escherichia coli, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, redox activity, ultramicroelectrodes, colistin, cobalt
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cell Survival, Cobalt, Colistin, Escherichia coli, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Electrochemical Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review