Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Best Practice: Performance and Cost Evaluation of Lithium Ion Battery Active Materials with Special Emphasis on Energy Efficiency

Meister, Paul, Jia, Haiping, Li, Jie, Kloepsch, Richard, Winter, Martin, Placke, Tobias·2016·Chemistry of Materials

Abstract

In order to increase the energy content of lithium ion batteries (LIBs), researchers worldwide focus on high specific energy (Wh/kg) and energy density (Wh/L) anode and cathode materials. However, most of the attention is primarily paid to the specific gravimetric and/or volumetric capacities of these materials, while other key parameters are often neglected. For practical applications, in particular for large size battery cells, the Coulombic efficiency (CE), voltage efficiency (VE), and energy efficiency (EE) have to be considered, which we point out in this work by comparing numerous LIB active materials. For all presented active materials, energy inefficiency is mainly caused by a voltage inefficiency, which in turn is affected by the voltage hysteresis between the charge and discharge curves. Hence, this study could show that materials with larger voltage hysteresis such as the ZnFe 2 O 4 (ZFO) anode or the Li-rich cathode material exhibit also a lower VE and EE than for instance graphite and LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 . Furthermore, from the accumulated EE losses the resulting “extra energy costs” are calculated based on industry and domestic electricity costs in Germany, in Japan and in the U.S.A. In particular, in countries with higher electricity costs such as Germany, the accumulated extra energy, which is necessary to compensate the energy inefficiency while retaining a certain energy level in the electrode material, has a stronger impact on the extra energy costs and thus on the total cost of ownership of the battery cell system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02895

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Meister, P., Jia, H., Li, J., Kloepsch, R., Winter, M., & Placke, T.
Venue
Chemistry of Materials
Published
2016-10-04
Volume
28
Issue
20
Pages
7203-7217
ISSN
  • 0897-4756 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5002
OpenAlex
W2521081399
Cited by
364
References
3
FWCI
24.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best Practice: Performance and Cost Evaluation of Lithium Ion Battery Active Materials with Special Emphasis on Energy Efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02895
The paper
Meister, P., Jia, H., Li, J., Kloepsch, R., Winter, M., & Placke, T. (2016). Best Practice: Performance and Cost Evaluation of Lithium Ion Battery Active Materials with Special Emphasis on Energy Efficiency. Chemistry of Materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02895

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.