Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Contribution of Wildland-Fire Smoke to US PM2.5 and Its Influence on Recent Trends

O’Dell, Katelyn, Ford, Bonne, Fischer, Emily V., Pierce, Jeffrey R.·2019·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Seasonal-mean concentrations of particulate matter with diameters smaller than 2.5 μm (PM 2.5 ) have been decreasing across the United States (US) for several decades, with large reductions in spring and summer in the eastern US. In contrast, summertime-mean PM 2.5 in the western US has not significantly decreased. Wildfires, a large source of summertime PM 2.5 in the western US, have been increasing in frequency and burned area in recent decades. Increases in extreme PM 2.5 events attributable to wildland fires have been observed in wildfire-prone regions, but it is unclear how these increases impact trends in seasonal-mean PM 2.5 . Using two distinct methods, (1) interpolated surface observations combined with satellite-based smoke plume estimates and (2) the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model (CTM), we identify recent trends (2006–2016) in summer smoke, nonsmoke, and total PM 2.5 across the US. We observe significant decreases in nonsmoke influenced PM 2.5 in the western US and find increases in summer-mean smoke PM 2.5 in fire-prone regions, although these are not statistically significant due to large interannual variability in the abundance of smoke. These results indicate that without the influence of wildland fires, we would expect to have observed improvements in summer fine particle pollution in the western US but likely weaker improvements than those observed in the eastern US.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.8b05430

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
O’Dell, K., Ford, B., Fischer, E. V., & Pierce, J. R.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2019-01-25
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
1797-1804
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2913873397
Cited by
285
References
47
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.