Cited by 270Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchWater Treatment and DisinfectionFluoride Effects and Removal

Population-wide exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances from drinking water in the United States

Andrews, David Q., Naidenko, Olga V.·2020·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

The extent of ongoing exposure to the general public from per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in drinking water in the United States and worldwide remains uncertain. Here, we analyze publicly accessible data sets of PFAS occurrence in drinking water in the United States. Testing with detection limits below 1 ng/L revealed that mixtures of PFAS are nearly ubiquitous in surface water, the predominate source of drinking water for the U.S. population. We estimate that 18–80 million people in the U.S. receive tap water with 10 ng/L or greater concentration of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) combined, and over 200 million people likely receive water with a PFOA and PFOS concentration at or above 1 ng/L. Multiple U.S. states including California, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, and Vermont have either set or proposed limits for PFOA and PFOS that are significantly lower than the nonregulatory U.S. Environmental Protection Agency established lifetime drinking water health advisory level of 70 ng/L for the combined concentration of PFOA and PFOS. There is significant variation in PFAS occurrence within and between different U.S. states, highlighting the need for systematic monitoring of PFAS in both source and finished drinking water.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00713

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drinking water is an important pathway for human PFAS exposure.

    “Drinking water is an important pathway for human PFAS exposure (Andrews and Naidenko, 2020; Domingo and Nadal, 2019), and the US Environmental Protection Agency's maximum contaminant levels for PFAS (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2024b) may necessitate extensive supplementary treatment in some drinking water systems.”

    From PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns (2025) · cites this paper as Andrews and Naidenko, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, D. Q., & Naidenko, O. V.
Affiliations
Environmental Working Group, 1436 U Street NW, Suite 100, Washington, DC 20009, United States
Corresponding author
Andrews, David Q.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2020-10-14
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
931-936
ISSN
2328-8930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093401287
Cited by
270
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Yellow Chair Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, drinking water contamination, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, surface water, drinking water regulation, PFAS monitoring, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review