Cited by 199Protein Degradation and InhibitorsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamics

In Silico Modeling of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complexes: Validation and Application

Open access
Drummond, Michael L., Williams, Christopher I.·2019·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Abstract

In this work, four methods are described and validated for generating in silico ensembles of PROTAC-mediated ternary complexes. Filters based on characteristics of the proposed ternary complexes are developed to identify those that resemble known crystal structures. We then show how to use these modeling techniques a priori to discriminate the PROTAC-mediated degradation behavior of a mutant protein vs its wild type, of three closely related targets, and among three different PROTAC molecules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00872

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drummond and Williams proposed four methods combining linker conformational searches with protein-protein docking, leading to virtual models of ternary complexes resembling known crystal structures.

    “Soon after, Drummond and Williams proposed four methods that combined linker conformational searches with protein-protein docking, leading to virtual models of ternary complexes that resembled known crystal structures.174,175”

    From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [175]

  • Attempts to predict protein interfaces via docking simulations have been reported, but the discovery of PROTACs remains empirical at this time.

    “Attempts to predict protein interfaces via docking simulations were recently reported 46,53 , but the discovery of PROTACs remains empirical at this time.”

    From Targeted protein degradation: expanding the toolbox (2019) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drummond, M. L., & Williams, C. I.
Affiliations
Chemical Computing Group, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2R7, Canada
Corresponding author
Drummond, Michael L.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2019-02-04
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
1634-1644
ISSN
  • 1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-960X
OpenAlex
W2913446986
Cited by
199
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
PROTACs, ternary complex, protein degradation, in silico modeling, molecular ensembles, protein mutants
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Reproducibility of Results, Small Molecule Libraries, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review