Cited by 103Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Bifunctional chemical probes inducing protein–protein interactions

Open access
Maniaci, Chiara, Ciulli, Alessio·2019·Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract

Inducing biomolecular interactions with synthetic molecules to impact biological function is a concept of enormous appeal. Recent years have seen a resurgence of interest in designing bispecific molecules that serve as bridging agents to bring proteins together. Pioneering structural and biophysical investigation of ternary complexes formed by mono-functional and bifunctional ligands highlights that proximity-induced stabilization or de novo formation of protein-protein interactions is a common feature of their molecular recognition. In this review, we illustrate these concepts and advances with representative case studies, and highlight progress over the past three years, with particular focus on recruitment to E3 ubiquitin ligases by 'molecular glues' and chimeric dimerizers (PROTACs) for targeted protein degradation. This approach promises to significantly expand the range of tractable targets for chemical biology and therapeutic intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.07.003

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maniaci, C., & Ciulli, A.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Ciulli, Alessio
Venue
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
52
Pages
145-156
ISSN
1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2968850568
Cited by
100
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • European Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, bispecific molecules, molecular glues, PROTACs, E3 ubiquitin ligase, targeted protein degradation, ternary complex, chemical biology
MeSH terms
Ligands, Proteins, Molecular Probes, Dimerization, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review