Cited by 209Machine Learning in Materials ScienceCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Machine learning meets volcano plots: computational discovery of cross-coupling catalysts

Open access
Meyer, Benjamin, Sawatlon, Boodsarin, Heinen, Stefan, von Lilienfeld, O. Anatole, Corminboeuf, Clémence·2018·Chemical Science

Abstract

The application of modern machine learning to challenges in atomistic simulation is gaining attraction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8sc01949e

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 137 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Senkan S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001 40 312 329 11180318
  2. Evans M. G. Polanyi M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1938 34 11 24
  3. Bell R. P. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1936 154 414 429
  4. Hammett L. P. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1938 34 156 165
  5. Parsons R. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1958 54 1053 1063
  6. Rasmussen C. E. and Williams C. K. I., Gaussian processes for machine learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2006.
  7. Rupp M. Ramakrishnan R. von Lilienfeld O. A. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015 6 3309 3313 PMC4476293 26113956
  8. Weininger D. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 1970 1 14
  9. Weigend F. Ahlrichs R. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005 7 3297 3305 16240044
  10. Ananikov V. P. Musaev D. G. Morokuma K. Organometallics 2005 24 715 723 PMC1430384 16601823

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, B., Sawatlon, B., Heinen, S., von Lilienfeld, O. A., & Corminboeuf, C.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Institute of Physical Chemistry
  • Laboratory for Computational Molecular Design
Venue
Chemical Science
Published
2018
Volume
9
Issue
35
Pages
7069-7077
ISSN
  • 2041-6520 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-6539
OpenAlex
W2805401872
Cited by
209
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (The National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR))
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
C–C cross-coupling, oxidative addition, transition metal catalysts, catalyst activity prediction, palladium phosphine complexes, copper catalysts, catalyst discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review