Cited by 498Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Preferential Cancer Cell Self-Recognition and Tumor Self-Targeting by Coating Nanoparticles with Homotypic Cancer Cell Membranes

Zhu, Jing-Yi, Zheng, Di-Wei, Zhang, Ming-Kang, Yu, Wu-Yang, Qiu, Wen-Xiu, Hu, Jing-Jing, Feng, Jun, Zhang, Xian-Zheng·2016·Nano Letters

Abstract

The ultimate goal in cancer therapy and diagnosis is to achieve highly specific targeting to cancer cells. Coated with the source cancer cell membrane specifically derived from the homologous tumors, the nanoparticles are identified with the self-recognition internalization by the source cancer cell lines in vitro and the highly tumor-selective targeting "homing" to the homologous tumor in vivo even in the competition of another heterologous tumor. As the result, MNP@DOX@CCCM nanovehicle showed strong potency for tumor treatment in vivo and the MR imaging. This bioinspired strategy shows great potential for precise therapy/diagnosis of various tumors merely by adjusting the cell membrane source accordingly on the nanoparticle surface.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02786

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific membrane proteins such as focal adhesion proteins, integrin, focal adhesion kinase, and ras homologous family proteins contribute to functions of brain tumor cell membrane-coated systems.

    “Specific membrane proteins, such as focal adhesion proteins, integrin, focal adhesion kinase, and ras homologous family proteins, contribute to the functions of brain tumor cell membrane-coated systems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, J.-Y., Zheng, D.-W., Zhang, M.-K., Yu, W.-Y., Qiu, W.-X., Hu, J.-J., Feng, J., & Zhang, X.-Z.
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Biomedical Polymers of Ministry of Education & Department of Chemistry, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Feng, Jun
Venue
Nano Letters
Published
2016-08-15
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
5895-5901
ISSN
  • 1530-6984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6992
OpenAlex
W2515800095
Cited by
498
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nano Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2042014kf0193)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2011CB606202)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2014CFB697)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21174110, 21374085)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
cancer cell membrane coating, tumor-targeted nanoparticles, tumor homing, magnetic nanoparticles, doxorubicin delivery, contrast-enhanced MRI
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Doxorubicin, Ferric Compounds, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetics, Neoplasms, Drug Delivery Systems, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review