Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Freezing-Tolerant, Highly Sensitive Strain and Pressure Sensors Assembled from Ionic Conductive Hydrogels with Dynamic Cross-Links

Liu, Hongyan, Wang, Xing, Cao, Yanxia, Yang, Yanyu, Yang, Yatian, Gao, Yafei, Ma, Zhanshan, Wang, Jianfeng, Wang, Wanjie, Wu, Decheng·2020·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
DOI 10.1021/acsami.0c06067
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Conductive hydrogels have attracted intensive attention for versatile functions in flexible electronics because of their unique combination of mechanical flexibility and conductivity. However, hydrogels containing plenty of water inevitably freeze at subzero temperature, leading to invalid electronics with failed mechanical advantages and negligible conductivity. Moreover, the inferior elasticity and fatigue resistance of hydrogels result in unstable sensing performance and poor reusability of hydrogel-based electronics. Herein, a freezing-tolerant, high-sensitive, durable strain and pressure sensor was constructed from an ionic conductive chitosan–poly(acrylamide- co -acrylic acid) double-network [CS–P(AM- co -AA) DN] hydrogel with dual-dynamic cross-links (chitosan physical network and ionic coordination [CO 2 LFe III ]), which was feasibly fabricated by soaking the CS–P(AM- co -AA) composite hydrogel in FeCl 3 solution. The ions immobilized in dynamic cross-links exerted crucial effects on improving mechanics [prominent tensile performance, supercompressibility, extraordinary elasticity, fast self-recovery capacity, and remarkable fatigue resistance (1000 cycles)]; meanwhile, the free ions in the hydrogel rendered the hydrogel excellent conductivity and strong freezing tolerance concurrently. The sensor assembled from the DN hydrogel exhibited cycling stability and good durability in detecting pressure, various deformations (elongation, compression, and bend), and human motions even at a low temperature (−20 °C). Notably, the sensitivity on detecting strain and pressure at both room and subzero temperature was superior than most of the reported organohydrogel and hydrogel sensors. Thus, we believe that this work will provide a platform for construction and application of high-sensitive strain and pressure hydrogel sensors with cycling stability and good durability in a wide temperature range.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.0c06067

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Liu, H., Wang, X., Cao, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, Y., Gao, Y., Ma, Z., Wang, J., Wang, W., & Wu, D.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
12
Issue
22
Pages
25334-25344
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
DOI
10.1021/acsami.0c06067
OpenAlex
W3026312221
Cited by
300
References
49
FWCI
13.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.