Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of Mass Flows and Membrane Cross-over in CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer

Open access
Larrazábal, Gastón O., Strøm-Hansen, Patrick, Heli, Jens P., Zeiter, Kevin, Therkildsen, Kasper T., Chorkendorff, Ib, Seger, Brian·2019·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Cell designs that integrate membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) with highly selective catalysts are a promising route to reduce ohmic losses and achieve high energy efficiency in CO 2 reduction at industrially relevant current densities. In this work, porous silver filtration membranes are demonstrated as simple and efficient gas-diffusion electrodes for CO 2 reduction to CO at high current densities in an MEA-type device. A partial current density for CO of up to ca. 200 mA cm –2 was achieved at a cell voltage of ca. 3.3 V, in tandem with minimal H 2 production. However, the analysis of cathodic and anodic outlet streams revealed that CO 2 cross-over across the anion-exchange membranes, mostly in the form of CO 3 2– but partially as HCOO – generated over the cathode, actually exceeds the amount of CO 2 converted to the target product, resulting in a poor utilization of the reactant and in the early onset of mass transfer limitations. In addition, CO 2 cross-over leads to a nonstoichiometric decrease of the outlet flow rate from the cathodic compartment. This effect can lead to a substantial overestimation of catalytic performance if the inlet flow rate of CO 2 is used as reference for calculating partial current densities and Faradaic efficiencies. The results of this work highlight the importance of carrying out a carbon balance, in addition to traditional measurements of activity and selectivity, to adequately assess the performance of CO 2 reduction devices at high current densities, and inform future efforts aimed at mitigating membrane cross-over in MEA-type electrolyzers for CO 2 reduction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.9b13081

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Larrazábal, G. O., Strøm-Hansen, P., Heli, J. P., Zeiter, K., Therkildsen, K. T., Chorkendorff, I., & Seger, B.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
11
Issue
44
Pages
41281-41288
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2979765932
Cited by
313
References
9
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Mass Flows and Membrane Cross-over in CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsami.9b13081
The paper
Larrazábal, G. O., Strøm-Hansen, P., Heli, J. P., Zeiter, K., Therkildsen, K. T., Chorkendorff, I., & Seger, B. (2019). Analysis of Mass Flows and Membrane Cross-over in CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.