The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of Mass Flows and Membrane Cross-over in CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer
Open accessAbstract
Cell designs that integrate membrane-electrode assemblies (MEAs) with highly selective catalysts are a promising route to reduce ohmic losses and achieve high energy efficiency in CO 2 reduction at industrially relevant current densities. In this work, porous silver filtration membranes are demonstrated as simple and efficient gas-diffusion electrodes for CO 2 reduction to CO at high current densities in an MEA-type device. A partial current density for CO of up to ca. 200 mA cm –2 was achieved at a cell voltage of ca. 3.3 V, in tandem with minimal H 2 production. However, the analysis of cathodic and anodic outlet streams revealed that CO 2 cross-over across the anion-exchange membranes, mostly in the form of CO 3 2– but partially as HCOO – generated over the cathode, actually exceeds the amount of CO 2 converted to the target product, resulting in a poor utilization of the reactant and in the early onset of mass transfer limitations. In addition, CO 2 cross-over leads to a nonstoichiometric decrease of the outlet flow rate from the cathodic compartment. This effect can lead to a substantial overestimation of catalytic performance if the inlet flow rate of CO 2 is used as reference for calculating partial current densities and Faradaic efficiencies. The results of this work highlight the importance of carrying out a carbon balance, in addition to traditional measurements of activity and selectivity, to adequately assess the performance of CO 2 reduction devices at high current densities, and inform future efforts aimed at mitigating membrane cross-over in MEA-type electrolyzers for CO 2 reduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte
Nitopi, S., Bertheussen, E., Scott, S. B., Liu, X., Engstfeld, A. K., Horch, S., Seger, B., Stephens, I. E. L., Chan, K., Hahn, C., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 · Cited by 5,223
Self-citationCO 2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface
Dinh, C.-T., Burdyny, T., Kibria, M. G., Seifitokaldani, A., Gabardo, C. M., García de Arquer, F. P., Kiani, A., Edwards, J. P., De Luna, P., Bushuyev, O. S., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aas9100 · Cited by 2,515
A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere
Keith, D. W., Holmes, G., St. Angelo, D., & Heidel, K. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 · Cited by 1,910
General Techno-Economic Analysis of CO 2 Electrolysis Systems
Jouny, M., Luc, W., & Jiao, F. (2018) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514 · Cited by 1,628
What Should We Make with CO2 and How Can We Make It?
Bushuyev, O. S., De Luna, P., Dinh, C. T., Tao, L., Saur, G., van de Lagemaat, J., Kelley, S. O., & Sargent, E. H. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003 · Cited by 1,593
Hori, Y., Kikuchi, K., & Suzuki, S. (1985) · Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1246/cl.1985.1695 · Cited by 1,401
Delacourt, C., Ridgway, P. L., Kerr, J. B., & Newman, J. (2008) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2801871 · Cited by 442
Electrolysis of CO2 to Syngas in Bipolar Membrane-Based Electrochemical Cells
Li, Y. C., Zhou, D., Yan, Z., Gonçalves, R. H., Salvatore, D. A., Berlinguette, C. P., & Mallouk, T. E. (2016) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00475 · Cited by 313
Larrazábal, G. O., Martín, A. J., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2017) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01380 · Cited by 176
Cited by
Yang, K., Kas, R., Smith, W. A., & Burdyny, T. (2021) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02184 · Cited by 474
Endrődi, B., Kecsenovity, E., Samu, A., Halmágyi, T., Rojas-Carbonell, S., Wang, L., Yan, Y., & Janáky, C. (2020) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02589e · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Larrazábal, G. O., Strøm-Hansen, P., Heli, J. P., Zeiter, K., Therkildsen, K. T., Chorkendorff, I., & Seger, B.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-10-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 41281-41288
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2979765932
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of Mass Flows and Membrane Cross-over in CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsami.9b13081
- The paper
- Larrazábal, G. O., Strøm-Hansen, P., Heli, J. P., Zeiter, K., Therkildsen, K. T., Chorkendorff, I., & Seger, B. (2019). Analysis of Mass Flows and Membrane Cross-over in CO2 Reduction at High Current Densities in an MEA-Type Electrolyzer. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b13081
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.