Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metal–Metal Bonds in Catalysis

Powers, Ian G., Uyeda, Christopher·2017·ACS Catalysis
DOI 10.1021/acscatal.6b02692
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Transition metals can assemble to form multinuclear complexes by engaging in direct metal-to-metal interactions. Metal–metal covalent bonds provide a large perturbation in electronic structure, relative to mononuclear metal ions, and the unique properties of these dinuclear fragments can be harnessed in a broad range of applications—for example, as chromophores in photochemical processes, redox centers in molecular electronics, or structural elements in metal–organic materials. There is a growing body of evidence that metal–metal bonds may also be formed under conditions relevant to catalysis and play a key role in transformations that were previously assumed to only involve mononuclear species. These findings have stimulated interest in characterizing multinuclear reaction pathways and developing well-defined multinuclear platforms as catalytic active sites. In this Perspective, we present case studies in this emerging area of catalysis research, emphasizing the impact of metal–metal bonding in either enhancing or depressing the rate and/or selectivity of a catalytic organic transformation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b02692

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Powers, I. G., & Uyeda, C.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Publisher
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Published
2016-12-29
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
936-958
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1021/acscatal.6b02692
OpenAlex
W2559821241
Cited by
369
References
71
FWCI
14.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.