Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 453

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrochemical Carbon Monoxide Reduction on Polycrystalline Copper: Effects of Potential, Pressure, and pH on Selectivity toward Multicarbon and Oxygenated Products

Open access
Wang, Lei, Nitopi, Stephanie A., Bertheussen, Erlend, Orazov, Marat, Morales-Guio, Carlos G., Liu, Xinyan, Higgins, Drew C., Chan, Karen, Nørskov, Jens K., Hahn, Christopher, Jaramillo, Thomas F.·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Understanding the surface reactivity of CO, which is a key intermediate during electrochemical CO 2 reduction, is crucial for the development of catalysts that selectively target desired products for the conversion of CO 2 to fuels and chemicals. In this study, a custom-designed electrochemical cell is utilized to investigate planar polycrystalline copper as an electrocatalyst for CO reduction under alkaline conditions. Seven major CO reduction products have been observed including various hydrocarbons and oxygenates which are also common CO 2 reduction products, strongly indicating that CO is a key reaction intermediate for these further-reduced products. A comparison of CO and CO 2 reduction demonstrates that there is a large decrease in the overpotential for C–C coupled products under CO reduction conditions. The effects of CO partial pressure and electrolyte pH are investigated; we conclude that the aforementioned large potential shift is primarily a pH effect. Thus, alkaline conditions can be used to increase the energy efficiency of CO and CO 2 reduction to C–C coupled products, when these cathode reactions are coupled to the oxygen evolution reaction at the anode. Further analysis of the reaction products reveals common trends in selectivity that indicate both the production of oxygenates and C–C coupled products are favored at lower overpotentials. These selectivity trends are generalized by comparing the results on planar Cu to current state-of-the-art high-surface-area Cu catalysts, which are able to achieve high oxygenate selectivity by operating at the same geometric current density at lower overpotentials. Combined, these findings outline key principles for designing CO and CO 2 electrolyzers that are able to produce valuable C–C coupled products with high energy efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b01200

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 453

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Nitopi, S. A., Bertheussen, E., Orazov, M., Morales-Guio, C. G., Liu, X., Higgins, D. C., Chan, K., Nørskov, J. K., Hahn, C., & Jaramillo, T. F.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-07-18
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
7445-7454
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883379740
Cited by
453
References
14
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical Carbon Monoxide Reduction on Polycrystalline Copper: Effects of Potential, Pressure, and pH on Selectivity toward Multicarbon and Oxygenated Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.8b01200
The paper
Wang, L., Nitopi, S. A., Bertheussen, E., Orazov, M., Morales-Guio, C. G., Liu, X., Higgins, D. C., Chan, K., Nørskov, J. K., Hahn, C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2018). Electrochemical Carbon Monoxide Reduction on Polycrystalline Copper: Effects of Potential, Pressure, and pH on Selectivity toward Multicarbon and Oxygenated Products. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.