Cited by 118Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

A Nimbolide-Based Kinase Degrader Preferentially Degrades Oncogenic BCR-ABL

Open access
Tong, Bingqi, Spradlin, Jessica N., Novaes, Luiz F. T., Zhang, Erika, Hu, Xirui, Moeller, Malte, Brittain, Scott M., McGregor, Lynn M. +5 more·2020·ACS Chemical Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Targeted protein degradation (TPD) and proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have arisen as powerful therapeutic modalities for degrading specific protein targets in a proteasome-dependent manner. However, a major limitation to broader TPD applications is the lack of E3 ligase recruiters. Recently, we discovered the natural product nimbolide as a covalent ligand for the E3 ligase RNF114. When linked to the BET family inhibitor JQ1, the resulting heterobifunctional PROTAC molecule was capable of selectively degrading BRD4 in cancer cells. Here, we show the broader utility of nimbolide as an E3 ligase recruiter for TPD applications. We demonstrate that a PROTAC linking nimbolide to the kinase and BCR-ABL fusion oncogene inhibitor dasatinib, BT1, selectively degrades BCR-ABL over c-ABL in leukemia cancer cells, compared to previously reported cereblon or VHL-recruiting BCR-ABL degraders that show opposite selectivity or in some cases inactivity. Further contrasting from cereblon or VHL-recruiting degradation, we show that BT1 treatment not only leads to BCR-ABL degradation, but also stabilizes the endogenous RNF114 substrate and tumor suppressor substrate p21. This leads to additional anti-proliferative effects in leukemia cancer cells beyond those observed with cereblon or VHL-recruiting BCR-ABL PROTACs. Thus, we further establish nimbolide as an additional general E3 ligase recruiter for PROTACs with unique additional benefits for oncology applications. We also further demonstrate the importance of expanding upon the arsenal of E3 ligase recruiters, as such molecules confer differing and unpredictable selectivity for the degradation of neo-substrate proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschembio.0c00348

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional generic E3 ligases (RNF4, RNF114, KEAP1, FEM1B) have been shown to be exploitable by PROTACs using small-molecule covalent tools to degrade BRD4.

    “a few additional ‘generic’ E3 ligases have been shown to be exploitable by PROTACs, using small-molecule covalent tools that specifically recruit the ligases to degrade the prototypical TPD substrate, BRD4; these ligases include ring finger protein 4 (RNF4)132, RNF114 (refs133–135), KEAP1 (refs136,137) and most recently, fem-1 homologue B (FEM1B)138.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [135]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tong, B., Spradlin, J. N., Novaes, L. F. T., Zhang, E., Hu, X., Moeller, M., Brittain, S. M., McGregor, L. M., McKenna, J. M., Tallarico, J. A., Schirle, M., Maimone, T. J., & Nomura, D. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Innovative Genomics Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Maimone, Thomas J.
  • Nomura, Daniel K.
Venue
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2020-06-22
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
1788-1794
ISSN
  • 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8937
OpenAlex
W3036563774
Cited by
118
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 6
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (F31CA239327, R01CA240981)
  • Mark Foundation For Cancer Research
  • Novartis-Berkeley Center for Proteomics and Chemistry Technologies, University of California, San Francisco
  • Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
nimbolide, PROTACs, targeted protein degradation, RNF114, BCR-ABL, dasatinib, c-Abl, leukemia, substrate specificity, covalent ligands
MeSH terms
Humans, Thiazoles, Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl, K562 Cells, Limonins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review