Cited by 73Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Tributary Loading and Sediment Desorption as Sources of PFAS to Receiving Waters

Open access
Balgooyen, Sarah, Remucal, Christina K.·2022·ACS ES&T Water

Abstract

Transport of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to the Great Lakes is of great importance as this large freshwater system provides drinking water to over 40 million people. Tributary PFAS loading to the Great Lakes is poorly characterized, and the role of sediments as a source or sink of PFAS is largely unknown. We quantified 10 perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in water (4–1310 ng/L) and sediment (below detection to 3255 ng/kg) of 41 tributaries to Green Bay of Lake Michigan. We demonstrate that tributary discharge plays a major role in PFAS contribution to receiving waters. In this system, three large rivers (i.e., Fox, Menominee, and Peshtigo Rivers) contribute two-thirds of the total tributary PFAA loading to Green Bay despite their relatively low concentrations. This circumvents the current regulatory focus on sites with high concentrations. Tributary PFAA composition is linked to likely sources, including a fire-fighting foam manufacturer, other industrial activities, and airports. In addition to tributary discharge, we show that tributary sediments can contribute to PFAA transport via desorption. Perfluorooctanesulfonate rapidly desorbs from contaminated riverbed sediments when equilibrated with Lake Michigan water, indicating that sediments may act as a PFAS source if water concentrations are reduced by pollution mitigation methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00348

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hydrologic variability such as tidal movements, precipitation, and baseflow fluctuations can create a dynamic adsorption, desorption, and partitioning cycle influencing PFAS transport, dilution, and sediment mobilization.

    “Hydrologic variability such as tidal movements, precipitation, and baseflow fluctuations can create a dynamic adsorption, desorption, and partitioning cycle to further influence PFAS transport, dilution, and sediment mobilization.”

    From Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Surface Water and Fluvial Sediments of a Rural Gulf Coast Watershed: A Year-long Spatiotemporal Assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Introduction and ‘Significance of PFAAs Sorbed to Tributary Sediment’ sections describe PFAS partitioning, sorption and desorption, including changes driven by water concentrations. The ‘PFAA Loading to the Bay of Green Bay from Tributaries’ section estimates transport under baseflow conditions but says relationships between PFAS concentrations and changing discharge have not been established. The paper does not establish the claimed effects of tidal movements or precipitation on this cycle, dilution, or sediment mobilization. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These findings may reflect that the Mississippi River is a major receiver of industrial and municipal wastewater or that Mississippi River sediments may serve as a source of sorbed and remobilized long-chain PFAS.

    “Long-chain PFAS tend to partition to river sediments (Fagbayigbo et al., 2022; Kolpin et al., 2021), so these findings may reflect that the Mississippi River is a major receiver of industrial and municipal wastewater or that Mississippi River sediments may serve as a source of sorbed and remobilized long-chain PFAS (Balgooyen and Remucal, 2022).”

    From PFAS in Iowa drinking water sources: Chemical and geospatial patterns (2025) · cites this paper as Balgooyen and Remucal, 2022

    The “Significance of PFAAs Sorbed to Tributary Sediment” section reports that contaminated tributary sediments can release PFAAs, including PFOS, into water. The paper studies Green Bay tributaries, however; its discussion of wastewater inputs concerns rivers there, not whether the Mississippi River is a major receiver of industrial and municipal wastewater or whether its sediments remobilize PFAS. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PFASs released from source zones during weathering and drainage events are delivered either via suspended solids in runoffs to surface waters or via leaching to groundwater.

    “PFASs released from source zones during weathering and drainage events are delivered either via suspended solids in runoffs to surface waters or via leaching to groundwater.11−13”
  • Sorption to river sediment and bioaccumulation in biota are other potential attenuation pathways along the river reach.

    “Sorption to river sediment and bioaccumulation in biota are other potential attenuation pathways along the river reach.13”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Xiao, F. Emerging poly-and perfluoroalkyl substances in the aquatic environment: A review of current literature. Water Res. 2017, 124, 482-495.
  2. Ahrens, L. Polyfluoroalkyl compounds in the aquatic environment: A review of their occurrence and fate. J Env. Monitor. 2011, 13 (1), 20-31.
  3. Lindstrom, A. B.; Strynar, M. J.; Libelo, E. L. Polyfluorinated compounds: Past, present, and future. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (19), 7954-7961.
  4. Houde, M.; Czub, G.; Small, J. M.; Backus, S.; Wang, X.; Alaee, M.; Muir, D. C. G. Fractionation and bioaccumulation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) isomers in a Lake Ontario food web. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42 (24), 9397-9403.
  5. Garg, S.; Kumar, P.; Mishra, V.; Guijt, R.; Singh, P.; Dumée, L. F.; Sharma, R. S. A review on the sources, occurrence and health risks of per-/poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) arising from the manufacture and disposal of electric and electronic products. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38 (101683), 1-15.
  6. Rayne, S.; Forest, K. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonic and carboxylic acids: A review of physicochemical properties, levels and patterns in waters and wastewaters, and treatment methods. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Tox. Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2009, 44 (12), 1145-1199.
  7. Rahman, M. F.; Peldszus, S.; Anderson, W. B. Behaviour and fate of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in drinking water treatment: A review. Water Res. 2014, 50, 318-340.
  8. Anderson, R. H.; Long, G. C.; Porter, R. C.; Anderson, J. K. Occurrence of select perfluoroalkyl substances at U.S. Air Force aqueous film-forming foam release sites other than fire-training areas: Field-validation of critical fate and transport properties. Chemosphere 2016, 150, 678-685.
  9. Moody, C. A.; Field, J. A. Determination of perfluorocarboxylates in groundwater impacted by fire-fighting activity. Env. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33 (16), 2800-2806.
  10. Hu, X. C.; Andrews, D. Q.; Lindstrom, A. B.; Bruton, T. A.; Schaider, L. A.; Grandjean, P.; Lohmann, R.; Carignan, C. C.; Blum, A.; Balan, S. A.; Higgins, C. P.; Sunderland, E. M. Detection of poly-and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in U.S. drinking water linked to industrial sites, military fire training areas, and wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2016, 3 (10), 344-350.
  11. Gottschall, N.; Topp, E.; Edwards, M.; Payne, M.; Kleywegt, S.; Lapen, D. R. Brominated flame retardants and perfluoroalkyl acids in groundwater, tile drainage, soil, and crop grain following a high application of municipal biosolids to a field. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 1345-1359.
  12. Ghisi, R.; Vamerali, T.; Manzetti, S. Accumulation of perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) in agricultural plants: A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 326-341.
  13. Crimmins, B. S.; McCarty, H. B.; Fernando, S.; Milligan, M. S.; Pagano, J. J.; Holsen, T. M.; Hopke, P. K. Commentary: Integrating non-targeted and targeted chemical screening in Great Lakes fish monitoring programs. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 2018, 44 (5), 1127-1135.
  14. Quinn, F. H. Hydraulic residence times for the Laurentian Great Lakes. J. Gt. Lakes Res. 1992, 18 (1), 22-28.
  15. Clement, R. E.; Reiner, E. J.; Bhavsar, S. P. Organohalogen contaminants of emerging concern in Great Lakes fish: A review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404 (9), 2639-2658.
  16. Remucal, C. K. Spatial and temporal variability of perfluoroalkyl substances in the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2019, 21, 1816-1834.
  17. Muir, D.; Miaz, L. T. Spatial and temporal trends of perfluoroalkyl substances in global ocean and coastal waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55 (14), 9527-9537.
  18. Guelfo, J. L.; Higgins, C. P. Subsurface Transport potential of perfluoroalkyl acids at aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-impacted sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (9), 4164-4171.
  19. Zareitalabad, P.; Siemens, J.; Hamer, M.; Amelung, W. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in surface waters, sediments, soils and wastewater - A review on concentrations and distribution coefficients. Chemosphere 2013, 91 (6), 725- 732.
  20. Codling, G.; Hosseini, S.; Corcoran, M. B.; Bonina, S.; Lin, T.; Li, A.; Sturchio, N. C.; Rockne, K. J.; Ji, K.; Peng, H.; Giesy, J. P. Current and historical concentrations of poly and perfluorinated compounds in sediments of the northern Great Lakes -Superior, Huron, and Michigan. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 236, 373-381.
  21. Awad, E.; Zhang, X.; Bhavsar, S. P.; Petro, S.; Crozier, P. W.; Reiner, E. J.; Fletcher, R.; Tittlemier, S. A.; Braekevelt, E. Long-term environmental fate of perfluorinated compounds after accidental release at Toronto Airport. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (19), 8081-8089.
  22. Milinovic, J.; Lacorte, S.; Vidal, M.; Rigol, A. Sorption behaviour of perfluoroalkyl substances in soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 511, 63-71.
  23. Miao, Y.; Guo, X.; Dan Peng; Fan, T.; Yang, C. Rates and equilibria of perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) sorption on soils from different regions of China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 139, 102-108.
  24. Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, S.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Z. Comparative sorption and desorption behaviors of PFHxS and PFOS on sequentially extracted humic substances. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 26 (12), 2517-2525.
  25. Pan, G.; Jia, C.; Zhao, D.; You, C.; Chen, H.; Jiang, G. Effect of cationic and anionic surfactants on the sorption and desorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) on natural sediments. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157 (1), 325-330.
  26. Jia, C.; You, C.; Pan, G. Effect of temperature on the sorption and desorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate on humic acid. J. Environ. Sci. China 2010, 22 (3), 355-361.
  27. You, C.; Jia, C.; Pan, G. Effect of salinity and sediment characteristics on the sorption and desorption of perfluorooctane sulfonate at sediment-water interface. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158 (5), 1343-1347.
  28. Place, B. J.; Field, J. A. Identification of novel fluorochemicals in aqueous film-forming foams used by the US military. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (13), 7120-7127.
  29. Harding-Marjanovic, K. C.; Houtz, E. F.; Yi, S.; Field, J. A.; Sedlak, D. L.; Alvarez-Cohen, L. Aerobic biotransformation of fluorotelomer thioether amido sulfonate (Lodyne) in AFFF- amended microcosms. Env. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 7666-7674.
  30. Kärrman, A.; Elgh-Dalgren, K.; Lafossas, C.; Møskeland, T. Environmental levels and distribution of structural isomers of perfluoroalkyl acids after aqueous fire-fighting foam (AFFF) contamination. Environ. Chem. 2011, 8 (4), 372-380.
  31. Mooney, R. J.; Stanley, E. H.; Rosenthal, W. C.; Esselman, P. C.; Kendall, A. D.; McIntyre, P. B. Outsized nutrient contributions from small tributaries to a Great Lake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2020, 117 (45), 28175-28182.
  32. Brusseau, M. L.; Khan, N.; Wang, Y.; Yan, N.; Van Glubt, S.; Carroll, K. C. Nonideal transport and extended elution tailing of PFOS in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53 (18), 10654-10664.
  33. Brusseau, M. L.; Yan, N.; Van Glubt, S.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.; Lyu, Y.; Dungan, B.; Carroll, K. C.; Holguin, F. O. Comprehensive retention model for PFAS transport in subsurface systems. Water Res. 2019, 148, 41-50.
  34. DeWitt, J. C. (Ed). Toxicological Effects of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances; Molecular and Integrative Toxicology; Humana Press, 2015.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balgooyen, S., & Remucal, C. K.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Remucal, Christina K.
Venue
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2022-02-10
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
436-445
ISSN
2690-0637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210973521
Cited by
73
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS ES&T Water (publishedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute, University of Wisconsin (R/HCE-39, R/HCE-40)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, perfluoroalkyl acids, sediment desorption, PFAS transport, Great Lakes, Green Bay, Lake Michigan, Fox River, PFOS, riverbed sediments, firefighting foam, airport emissions, industrial sources, pollution reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review