Cited by 137Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Targeting IRAK4 for Degradation with PROTACs

Open access
Nunes, Joao, McGonagle, Grant A., Eden, Jessica, Kiritharan, Girieshanie, Touzet, Megane, Lewell, Xiao, Emery, John, Eidam, Hilary +2 more·2019·ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Abstract

Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase 4 (IRAK4) is a key mediator of innate immunity. IRAK4 overactivation is linked with several autoimmune diseases. To date, many IRAK4 inhibitors have been developed to block the protein’s kinase activity with the most advanced reaching Phase II clinical trials. Nevertheless, several reports suggest kinase activity is not disease-relevant in certain cell types, so removing scaffolding signaling in addition to IRAK4 kinase activity may offer a better therapeutic outcome. Herein, we describe the design and synthesis of an IRAK4 Proteolysis Targeted Chimera (PROTAC). We show that IRAK4 degradation induced by compound 9 leads to the inhibition of multiple cytokines in PBMCs. However, in IL-1β stimulated human dermal fibroblasts, inhibition of IL-6 and TNF-α release was not observed despite IRAK4 degradation. Nonetheless, the possibility of targeting both IRAK4 kinase and scaffolding function could potentially lead to new therapeutic opportunities to treat autoimmune, inflammatory, and oncological diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.9b00219

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moving towards more rigid linkers can lead to improved potency and selectivity.

    “Capitalizing on the suggestion that moving towards more rigid linkers can lead to improved potency and selectivity (as exemplified by a recent example using a spirocyclic pyrimidine 68), this structure-based method is also well-positioned to suggest inflexible replacements for the typical PEG and alkyl linkers used in early-stage studies.”
  • IRAK4's scaffolding role may only be addressable by PROTAC degraders.

    “and may only be addressable by PROTAC degraders, many of which have been described to date173–175.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [174]

  • VHL-based PROTAC degrades IRAK4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and dermal fibroblasts with DC50 values of 151 nM and 36 nM, respectively.

    “Nunes et al. reported a VHL-based PROTAC that was capable of degrading IRAK4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and dermal fibroblasts with DC50 values of 151 nM and 36 nM, respectively [184].”
  • An IRAK4 PROTAC has been shown to be more therapeutically relevant compared to IRAK4 inhibitors in part by removing the scaffolding signaling mediated by IRAK4.

    “an interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) PROTAC has been shown to be more therapeutically relevant compared to IRAK4 inhibitors in part by removing the scaffolding signaling mediated by IRAK4 [52].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nunes, J., McGonagle, G. A., Eden, J., Kiritharan, G., Touzet, M., Lewell, X., Emery, J., Eidam, H., Harling, J. D., & Anderson, N. A.
Affiliations
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Niall A.
Venue
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Published
2019-06-14
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1081-1085
ISSN
1948-5875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949458744
Cited by
134
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
IRAK4, PROTACs, protein degradation, innate immunity, autoimmune disease, IL-1β, cytokine inhibition, interleukin-6, TNF-α, kinase inhibitors, dermal fibroblasts, peripheral blood mononuclear cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review