Cited by 17Algal biology and biofuel productionBiofuel production and bioconversionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Anaerobic Storage and Conversion of Microalgal Biomass to Manage Seasonal Variation in Cultivation

Wendt, Lynn M., Wahlen, Bradley D., Knoshaug, Eric P., Nagle, Nicholas J., Dong, Tao, Spiller, Ryan, Panczak, Bonnie, Van Wychen, Stefanie +3 more·2020·ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

Abstract

Seasonal variation in microalgal biomass production is a well-known challenge when optimizing economics for algal fuel conversion, especially given the fluctuation in biomass production between winter and summer. Wet storage offers significant potential for cost and energy savings compared to dewatering and dry storage. This study demonstrates the feasibility of preserving harvested Scenedesmus acutus biomass through wet anaerobic storage for use in biochemical conversion. Anaerobic storage effectively preserved biomass with minimal degradation of carbohydrates and preservation of lipids and proteins. Screening experiments identified optimal pretreatment conditions for stored biomass. Scale-up of pretreatment enabled fermentation of the hydrolysate to butyric acid and indicated no observable difference in conversion between unstored and stored biomass. Lipid extraction improved by a relative 12% for stored biomass. These results suggest that wet anaerobic storage can effectively manage seasonal variation in biomass production and is compatible with biochemical approaches for biofuel production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03790

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wendt, L. M., Wahlen, B. D., Knoshaug, E. P., Nagle, N. J., Dong, T., Spiller, R., Panczak, B., Van Wychen, S., Dempster, T. A., Gerken, H., & Pienkos, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Idaho National Laboratory (US)
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
  • Renewable Resources and Enabling Sciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
  • Santa Fe Community College (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Wendt, Lynn M.
Venue
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2020-07-31
Volume
8
Issue
35
Pages
13310-13317
ISSN
2168-0485 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046436023
Cited by
17
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (DE-AC07-05ID14517)
  • National Renewable Energy Laboratory (DE-AC36-08GO28308)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
microalgal biomass, anaerobic storage, wet storage, seasonal variation, Scenedesmus acutus, biochemical conversion, pretreatment, butyric acid fermentation, lipid extraction, biofuel production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review