Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PRINT: A Novel Platform Toward Shape and Size Specific Nanoparticle Theranostics

Open access
Perry, Jillian L., Herlihy, Kevin P., Napier, Mary E., DeSimone, Joseph M.·2011·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Nanotheranostics represents the next generation of medicine, fusing nanotechnology, therapeutics, and diagnostics. By integrating therapeutic and imaging agents into one nanoparticle, this new treatment strategy has the potential not only to detect and diagnose disease but also to treat and monitor the therapeutic response. This capability could have a profound impact in both the research setting as well as in a clinical setting. In the research setting, such a capability will allow research scientists to rapidly assess the performance of new therapeutics in an effort to iterate their designs for increased therapeutic index and efficacy. In the clinical setting, theranostics offers the ability to determine whether patients enrolling in clinical trials are responding, or are expected to respond, to a given therapy based on the hypothesis associated with the biological mechanisms being tested. If not, patients can be more quickly removed from the clinical trial and shifted to other therapeutic options. To be effective, these theranostic agents must be highly site specific. Optimally, they will carry relevant cargo, demonstrate controlled release of that cargo, and include imaging probes with a high signal-to-noise ratio. There are many biological barriers in the human body that challenge the efficacy of nanoparticle delivery vehicles. These barriers include, but are not limited to, the walls of blood vessels, the physical entrapment of particles in organs, and the removal of particles by phagocytic cells. The rapid clearance of circulating particles during systemic delivery is a major challenge; current research seeks to define key design parameters that govern the performance of nanocarriers, such as size, surface chemistry, elasticity, and shape. The effect of particle size and surface chemistry on in vivo biodistribution of nanocarriers has been extensively studied, and general guidelines have been established. Recently it has been documented that shape and elasticity can have a profound effect on the behavior of delivery vehicles. Thus, having the ability to independently control shape, size, matrix, surface chemistry, and modulus is crucial for designing successful delivery agents. In this Account, we describe the use of particle replication in nonwetting templates (PRINT) to fabricate shape- and size-specific microparticles and nanoparticles. A particular strength of the PRINT method is that it affords precise control over shape, size, surface chemistry, and modulus. We have demonstrated the loading of PRINT particles with chemotherapeutics, magnetic resonance contrast agents, and fluorophores. The surface properties of the PRINT particles can be easily modified with "stealth" poly(ethylene glycol) chains to increase blood circulation time, with targeting moieties for targeted delivery or with radiolabels for nuclear imaging. These particles have tremendous potential for applications in nanomedicine and diagnostics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar2000315

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Perry, J. L., Herlihy, K. P., Napier, M. E., & DeSimone, J. M.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2011-08-02
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
990-998
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2000928953
Cited by
290
References
58
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.