The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Controllable Surface Modification of Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) by Hydrolysis or Aminolysis I: Physical, Chemical, and Theoretical Aspects
Abstract
While biodegradable, biocompatible polyesters such as poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) are popular materials for the manufacture of tissue engineering scaffolds, their surface properties are not particularly suitable for directed tissue growth. Although a number of approaches to chemically modify the PLGA surface have been reported, their applicability to soft tissue scaffolds, which combine large volumes, complex shapes, and extremely fine structures, is questionable. In this paper, we describe two wet-chemical methods, base hydrolysis and aminolysis, to introduce useful levels of carboxylic acid or primary and secondary amine groups, respectively, onto the surface of PLGA with minimal degradation. The effects of temperature, concentration, pH, and solvent type on the kinetics of these reactions are studied by following changes in the wettability of the PLGA using contact angle measurements. In addition, the treated surfaces are studied using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to determine the effect on the surface chemical structure. Furthermore, we show using XPS analysis that these carboxyl and amine groups are readily activated to allow the covalent attachment of biological macromolecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Liu, Y., Ai, K., & Lu, L. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400407a · Cited by 4,794
Polymer surface modification for the attachment of bioactive compounds
Goddard, J. M., & Hotchkiss, J. H. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.04.002 · Cited by 1,379
Electrospun polymeric nanofibres as wound dressings: A review
Miguel, S. P., Figueira, D. R., Simões, D., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Ferreira, P., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.011 · Cited by 362
Functionalized synthetic biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering.
Liu, X., Holzwarth, J. M., & Ma, P. X. (2012) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.201100466 · Cited by 290
Li, X., Xie, J., Yuan, X., & Xia, Y. (2008) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la802984a · Cited by 254
Robin, B., Albert, C., Beladjine, M., Legrand, F.-X., Geiger, S., Moine, L., Nicolas, V., Canette, A., Trichet, M., Tsapis, N., et al. (2021) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.061 · Cited by 40
Kasoju, N., Pátíková, A., Wawrzynska, E., Vojtíšková, A., Sedlačík, T., Kumorek, M., Pop-Georgievski, O., Sticová, E., Kříž, J., & Kubies, D. (2020) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/c9bm01280j · Cited by 36
Huang, J., Zhou, X., Shen, Y., Li, H., Zhou, G., Zhang, W., Zhang, Y., & Liu, W. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36793 · Cited by 32
Kim, G., Gavande, V., Shaikh, V., & Lee, W.-K. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28124810 · Cited by 28
Shafiq, M., & Kim, S. H. (2016) · Macromolecular Research · doi:10.1007/s13233-016-4138-x · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Croll, T. I., O'Connor, A. J., Stevens, G. W., & Cooper-White, J. J.
- Venue
- Biomacromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-01-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 463-473
- ISSN
- 1525-7797 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-4602
- OpenAlex
- W2149575651
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.